You say "anyone" and mean "Khaled Al-Mutairy"

Submitted by Ianus (Poland), Jul 15, 2008 at 05:06

Khaled Al-Mutairy wrote : >>Paradoxical to see a Moslem caring for Jews and secularity! FYI >Why?< For semantic reasons. (Cf. the meanings of "secularism" and "Islam" and then ponder upon the brutal slaughters of Jews by your so called "prophet" - no peace upon him- and you'll see how hypocritical and crooked your 'concerns' about Jews are. >>we have no laws punishing with stoning, decapitation, hanging etc. anyone willing to sell their land to a Jew ... as is the case in Jordan or in your beloved Saudi Arabia<< >there are no Muslim countries with such laws.< ' Under the direct instructions of King Husayn the government of Jordan in 1973 passed the "Law for Preventing the Sale of Immovable Property to the Enemy." The "enemy" is defined in Article 2 as "any man or judicial body [corporation] of Israeli citizenship living in Israel or acting on its behalf."

Under Article 4 of this law any Jordanian citizen who sold land in Jordan or the West Bank to the "enemy" faced the death penalty and forfeiture of all his property to the state: The sale of Immovable property against the provisions of this law constitutes a crime against state security and well being, punishable by death, and the confiscation of all the culprit's Immovable and moveable possessions. In addition, Article 3 deemed the sale of land to any alien (i.e., a non-Arab) without permission from the Council of Ministers a security offense punishable by death. According to PA Attorney General Khalid al-Qidra, Jordan had sentenced 172 people to death under this law.25 Amnesty International reported that as of 1988 many of the convictions were in absentia and that there had been no executions.26 However, PA Justice Minister Meddein claimed that Jordan had executed 10 violators.27' http://www.meforum.org/article/370 The fact that this law was repealed on paper in 1995 doesn't change in essence much as "The Law on Economic Boycott and Banning Dealing with the Enemy (Article 6) states that "it is impermissible for foreign persons or corporate entities that do not hold an Arab nationality to purchase, lease, or own directly or indirectly any immovable property in the kingdom." (ibidem with footnotes )

>İ have no idea where you read this fact, but İ got a good laugh. Thanks for reminding me what it feels like to laugh so hard that it really hurts.> Read the above and keep smiling! ... Allah is great, isn't (s)he? >İ am not Saudi. İ am from the Kingdom of Bahrain. Heard of it?< Another Oriental Moslem satrapy with practically all citizens being Moslems. The non-Moslems are non-citizens and are better advised to practise their faith in private which is not the case with the state religion which is practised in public. Anyway, to see how discrimative and corrupt your regime (whose part you're , a Bahraini diplomat !) consult http://www.bahrainrights.org/node/29 Disregarding the kafirs in Bahrain , let's quote some inter-Moslem discriminatory facts :

"Despite the clear outnumbering of Shiites in society, the percentage of Shiites occupying top government jobs is either low or non-existent, reflecting blatant discrimination in public jobs. Followers of the Shiite sect occupy merely 18% of the total of high-ranking posts covered by the report. Critical jobs such as ministers of foreign affairs and interior are off limits for the Shiite. In fact, the real percentage of high-ranking posts occupied by the Shiite is most likely less than what this report has concluded; so is the case because some establishments not covered in the report do not employ Shiite." >>And I myself am 100% for Israel ! How about you?

>İ am 100% for peace. Are you?< I am for semantic clarity. If a Moslem says "peace" he means something absolutely different from what a kafir like myself means. There can be no peace long as dar-al-harb and dar-al-Islam exist. Islam means eternal war -first gainst us kafirs and then against itself -its innumerous sects and heresies. This is what you mean - supremacy and destruction of all our dar-al-harb! >>Moslems use the same words we kafirs do but they mean quite different things. >Please explain??< Read the above again about "peace", jihadist! >Generally, Islam - the religion of Lies and War - engenders liars and hypocrites and murderers.< >Pretty old rhetoric. Come up with something new next time.< Mark it- I am not after something new but true. If you're, then you'd better read science fiction. >Plenty of other threads where İ can read the same garbage.< "Jihad" means "peace" in Quranic, doesn't it ?

>Once again, you need to learn how to debate intellectually. You are just insulting a religion and being very racist.<

So racism is now applicable to religion ? That's the biggest discovery since the the flight of Muhammed on al-Buraq, isn't it? Your semantics works wonders. >İ am saying this for your own good.< A Moslem jihadist concerned about a kafir's good...Hm... how sematically surprising ! >>As a Moslem you're sort of little Allah , a Mohamed in miniature –<< >Very disrespectful comment.< There is a fundamental conflict between truth and respect. Truth can only and only win if we get rid of all and any respect. You Moslems will never get the point though. You are to infantile to imagine the simplest things as long as they clash with the nonsense you worship as "al haqq" (truth=Quran). Hence never ever expect respect for me! >But you are only harming your own credibility. As a Muslim, İ am just simply a Muslim with my own set of beliefs. But my religion is my own business –a private matter; the same way your religion is your own business. İ happen to be secular-minded and tolerant. You on the other hand, you need help.<

Read again my comment on semantics and come back with a better fairy tale to hoodwink me with.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".