why?

Submitted by dimitri (Belgium), Jun 28, 2014 at 16:51

Hi

Why are you so mad to this fellow? I read your replies and you are calling him names?

The Quran is anything but a scientific book. Science works with scientific models: what you are saying about this 'proof' you claim that is in there is not proof; it is quessing and wishthinking from what I read.

Here is an explanation of what the atmospheric layers consist of and are: http://airs.jpl.nasa.gov/maps/satellite_feed/atmosphere_layers/

isnt it a shame that this information isnt in your book, as it should be, in a true scientific book?
+ your statement on the atmosphere is false as in verse 41:12 it inclines that the stars would be on cloudlevel.
The ionosphere overlaps the exo and thermosphere; while the need to include the magnetosphere as a 'layer' is highly inflated in the arguments you so called scientists use. How about the ozonlayer, the planetary boundary layer between layers?

and if you read well; i just gave you 7 reasons to stop believing the nonsense religion is

1: it makes you mad at people for not believing you

2: the quran doesnt work with scientific models (ex: dna = a MODEL, not a true reality)

3:you should read up on other things than the quran because you become a tool

4: your book is wrong (argument of stars; but also; the circular shape of earth, etc..please read on the ancient greeks a little bit more, or the chinese.)

5: the atmosphere is much more complicated than the quran states

6; there are 5 layers in the atmosphere

7: even I can sum up 7 arguments without having to think about them while writing my text. I've made them up after I finished writing.

sincerely

D

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".