True Exchange of Facts Requires Confirmation of Facts - Or Such Exchanges Result in Opinions

Submitted by M. Tovey (United States), Aug 6, 2008 at 19:01

In these exchanges, there has been one primary necessity of this reader, to provide a correct reading of the Holy Bible, the only true basis for any discussion on the Word of the LORD, of His Son, the Anointed One, the Holy One of Israel.

In your other post, you make reference to the Isaiah 12 citations as referring to Almighty God; though it is evident from your other postings you make no such association to reference Jesus Christ, yet by the faith in the understanding of the scripture references to Jesus Christ, since it is scripturally correct to say that Jesus Christ is the same as Almighty God, then, yes Isaiah does refer top Almighty God, but in so doing, refers to Jesus Christ prophetically in His first appearance to the Jews.

In the obverse to your comment that the Holy Bible is a corrupt book, you have yet to prove the sources of corroboration to make good on your claim. The attempts earlier to make some valid contravening notations of corruption are old and have been invalidated by better scholars than myself, though emphatically, my scholarship in the Holy Bible is a mere thirty years years in the running, and there are so many attempts to invalidate the Bible yet to go.

In this exchange, I will express a curiosity, who do the Sunni say that the al-Madhi will be, for there are questions that come from the assertions of some in Iran that point the finger at M. Ahmadinejad?

What say ye?

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".