OMG Michael, Obama's your man I bet

Submitted by jennifer solis (United States), Aug 18, 2008 at 16:01

First off, you took the title of my post and literally RAN with it!

When I quoted you, "we have a few angry young blacks at Howard and a few angry young whites at Berkely" I then compared it to the WORLD WIDE number of radical Islamists - over a hundred million - THEY are the ones who riot in the streets (in France, in Pakistan, Netherlands, Malasia, etc) at any thing from a Muhammad cartoon to wearing red on Valentine's day!

As far as Europe, a reason why there is more evidence of Islamism is presicely because of Europe's "open arms" of inclusion and Europe's utter lack of patriotism on behalf of the native population.

Which is a marvelous segway into this: when B. Hussein Obama (whom I wouldn't be surprised you support) becomes President, the New Socialist America that will emerge (should Obama have his way) will make Eurabia look Republican.

You can be sure that Obama is the golden boy of not only the liberal democrats, but all America - bashers, including the majority of the 100,000,000-150,000,000 Islamists just itching for the day when they will have a COWARD in the White House.

Who would Osama Bin Laden vote for?

Have you ever heard of "sleeper cells" in the U.S., Michael. And you left out Michigan as well as San Diego - and Philadelphia - and Texas - do you READ any of Dr. Pipes' articles?

The Patriot Act as well as a Republican in the White House is a major reason why we don't see more widespread, overt Islamism here in the U.S. The clock is ticking, and the eleventh hour will be 2009 if Obama gets elected. THEN we will see the "rioting in the streets", right here in the good ol' U.S.A.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".