True Source About Jesus Christ Remains in the Holy Bible

Submitted by M. Tovey (United States), Aug 21, 2008 at 19:38

It took some time to respond to this, even to the extent that since there is no credible corroboration to this, was there even the necessity to respond at all. There is so much written in this previous post that does not stand the test of truth, only a couple of items will be addressed.

Of the many previous exchanges between this reader and sTs, this one has much more bravado in trying to absorb Jewish theology as its own, and we'll start with the use of the term (we'll use his pronunciation) Maseeh, which, since both languages are semitic, mean the same thing. Which language came to the use of the term first is a matter of semantics, though in the Hebrew Holy Scriptures, which came before the Quran, is the term Almighty God uses for the prophecy of His Son, Yeshua. The Quran in its error of unbelief about Jesus Christ, will not tell you that. It is mentioned in the Hebrew Holy Scriptures specifically to point to the first and second appearances of Yeshua HaMashiach.

From there, in unbelief, sTs continues to build an unsubstantiated argument using circular assumptions based on an unbelieving Quran and extra-religious (but unnamed) sources that completely subverts the truth about Jesus Christ.

Since it is correct that there is no more time, if one really wants the truth about Jesus Christ, remember, the Holy Bible is the only source, for it is the only place where the truth was written in belief.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".