Our dear "really" aka CLdwards and this time no "brackets"! Part 2

Submitted by dhimmi no more, Dec 12, 2018 at 08:19

So our dear CLDwards al-tablighee and his bogus "argument from brackets"

>I am trying to figure how the author of this post doesn't understand that words in brackets are translators notes.

Now check Sahih International translation of Surat al-Furqan 52 here is the link

https://quran.com/25/52

"Do not believe the disbelievers, and strive against them with the Quran a great striving"

So you tell us:

1. Where can we find the word القران in the verse? Let me help you: It is not in the verse! It is a big fat lie.

2. How come the translators at Sahih International did not place the word Qur'an between brackets?

3. So were the brackets in this case eaten by a hungry goat too like the one that ate the Qur'an?

4. And if we turn to al-Qurtubi we discover that the word به or "with it" refers to السيف or the sword! So was he a liar or was he ignorant?

5. Where are the "brackets"? What a disaster

And I only just started

It is shameful to lie in a translation!

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".