Riaz, WHY CAN'T YOU BE SPECIFIC AND HONEST?

Submitted by Nur el Masih Ben Haq (United States), Jun 30, 2011 at 14:48

After your desperate, hasty and clumsy attempt to discredit me backfired, you became so overwhelmed with shame that you further lost sense so much so that your attempt to save your face only expose your idiocy further.

You tried to rationalize your failed attempt to blackmail me thus:

" I gave you the reference for that chunk ... Its rest of that I attributed to Answering Islam"

But this is what you had actually said:

" You copied from ….

Answering Islam.

http://www.questhall.com/quest/q/10611256P3528708 "

As you can see, you did not only say I copied it from Answering Islam, but you even cited the supposed specific Answering Islam article from where I supposedly copied. And now you want to cowardly deny. You are a foolish liar!

In fact, you later emphasized, " .. The maurice Bucaille bit is copied non-sense from another debate. I have posted the link above."

Coming back to your latest,failed face-saving attempt, you said "..Its rest of that I attributed to Answering Islam"

Can you please 'man up' enough to tell the world what specifically are 'the rest' which I copied from Answering Islam.? Why can't you stop employing vague expression if you are sure of yourself?

Let me advice you, next time you want to discredit me, better do your home work or risk being further embarrassed by yourself.

These days taqiyya tactics don't work even on most Westerners much less a person of my background. You better be real and stop hiding behind ambiguity and vague expressions.

And to your empty rant:

"Jeez! You got to do a lot better. Its three comments that you have NOT been able to counter."

Stop making your self look more stupid. All the trash you said have been well countered! There is NO MUSLIM---not even Zakir Naik or hired atheistic Western 'former Pastor' Yusuf Estes and the other greedy Western atheists you hired can stand me.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".