Another Mistake of Dhimmi

Submitted by Amin Riaz (United Kingdom), Aug 3, 2011 at 20:29

Ha Ha Ha

They are called harf Mushabbah Bil Fail - and not mabni at the end. This is the mistakes you make - when you do not know anything and then pretend to. mani is simple a characteristic of these 6 huroof that their end is unchangealbe.

How come you know this now - and previously you ridiculed whole idea of these particles being called Harf Mushabah bil fa'il at all. Now you stick a mabni at the end and pretend its all hunky-dory. Ha ha ...

You tried your best to poo-pah harf Mushabah Bil Fa'il the actual name of this category and Nafi al Jinns - as you said they are some sort of Pakistani Arabic - whatever that is.

And now you have looked up a website - mind you by far lesser Arabs or Muslims - rather than Masters and Geniuses of Arabic grammar. You rubbished them - and now you come across this website. Ha Ha. See how right you were.

Let me show you another mistake. That comes from your lack of knowledge

إن : حرف مشبه بالفعل مبني

ما : حرف مبني على السكون زائد

المؤمنون : مبتدأ مرفوع علامته الواو

اخوة : خبر مرفوع علامته تنوين الضم

The above is what you call ""syntactical analysis" another concept you knew nothing about and tried to rubbish. But look at it – after all this is your link.

These 6 particles are called harf mushabbah bil fail and there is no mabni – Here the particle Inna is being described as mabni – that is its end is unchangeable – that is not the name of the particle.

Go and look up – the analysis I did for you ad and look at you response to them … dhimmi. Oh "Pakistani Arabic" was it? Ha Ha Ha

Another thing you rubbished was the particle of whole genus – antoher thing that was supposedly

Another thing you failed to get was my name. You could not even get that right!!!!!!

Another thing you got wrong was the rule – you got that wrong twice – after I corrected you – you looked it up.

Another thing you got wrong was that you did not know the meaning of naghl.

And you could not even write one sentence in Arabic – that was virtually all wrong.

The biggest mistake – you got the rule for Inna and its sisters wrong TWICE. Yet you had the utter stupidity to pretend that there was mistake in the Quran.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".