Islam and its victims

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Aug 8, 2011 at 06:02

Our dear Amin the deobandi/tablighee whose Hindu ancetsors were brutalized by islam and who does not like the west inspite of the fact that kuffar pay the cost of his health care and his welfare check and who tells us that he owns a brand agency and he earned a glorious majisteer in Arabic and inspite of this he has no clue that fadiha is mu'anath (ya kharabi) and who provides us with all the typical tablighee BS about "syntactial analysis" and gobbledygook nonsense about in being a subject wa nafiah leljins (sic) and in laysat harf mushabbah bi fail (sic) and when I told him fine then go and write Skeikh al-Azhar and tell him that he has the answer to this big time karitha (hint this is also mu'anath) ! So did you send an e-mail to him to let him know that you have the answer?

Then when nothing worked he told us that there is a group of followers of the religion of the Arabs in the west that are working on proving that these quranic mistakes are really not mistakes. I told him that this already has been done by his masters at al-Azhar and I provided him with the name of the book and he can read it for himself. His objection was about the morphology of the letter hamza in the word haqa'iq how stupid

Hello: your Allah had no clue that there is a hamza letter se we really do not know what Allah had in mind in regard to its morphology unless it is some where in al-lawh al-mahfuz but would he read the book and comment on it? May the Gods forbid

It is your chance to shine our dear Amin who has a fragile Muslim ego go and write Skiekh al-Azhar and tell hi why you think that in hadhan lasahiran is not a mistake and he will think that you are a mossad spy who is making fun of islam go for it

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".