Ibn Naghl (sic) and teaching real spoken Arabic to wannabe Arabs

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Aug 6, 2011 at 14:36

Our dear Amin the wannabe arab and how come you are not a mullah and instead you own a brand agency? Let me guess because your Arab masters would rather hire an Arab and the last on their mind is to hire a Pakistani/Indian Muslims right?

>Ibn Naghl

ya niharak me-do-hass (this is Arabic) and yo' mama too (this is sarcasm)

Oh and I did prove that if he really means the son of the bastard then it should be ibn al-naghil or nagheel right our dear amin whose welfare check and the cost of his health care are paid by kuffar?

you are a munafiq kabeer

Now I urge him to go and call one of his Arab masters ibn naghl the answer is going to be "Huh?" as real Arabs would use the word ibn haram or illegitimate son and for this see HW page 171B and not ibn naghil

How come you did not know that?

Oh and did you send the e-mail to Shiekh al-Azhar to tell him that you our dear Amin the lost tablighee who earned an imaginary majisteer fi al-lugha al-3arabiyya that you have the final answer to this big time fadeeh (sic) kabeer (sic) ya lahwi in hadhan lasahiran and you can tell him that

1. in laysat harf mushabbah bi aw lel fi3l what ever that may be

2. in is a subject (sic)

3. in nafiah (sic) leljins (sic)

And like i said no "syntactical analysis" just tell them that why in hadhan lasahiran is correct and in hadhayne lasahiran is not correct and that is it and hello: and forget about qalu just al-jumla in hadhan lasahiran

ya nahar eswid he will be making a fool of himself

So it is your chance to shine mr fake

Oh and I'm still waiting for your link so i can check that you really graduate from Wahhabi Central

I urge you to get a grip on reality

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".