Islamic ignornace: Our dear Amin tells us that the most celebrated mistake in the Qur'an is really not a mistake read and laugh

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Jul 13, 2011 at 06:42

Our dear Amin who earned a master degrees in Arabic does not seem to be aware of a basic rule in the Arabic language grammar called ina wa ikhawatiha and so is his Allah

For the readers: In Hadhan la sahiran is the most celebrated mistake in Quranic Arabic and it is very well recognized mistake and here is whar Ali Dashti wrote about it and you will find it in his book 23 years or bist o seh sal page 49

in the verse 66 of surat 20 (Taha) where the pharaoh's people say moses and his brother aaron "these two are sorcerers" the word for "these two" HAAHDAANE is in the nominative case

For the readers: that is what i have said all along and oh there is more

because it comes after an introductory article

for the readers this is also what i wrote and this is what ina wa akhawatiha rule is all about. Oh our Dear Amin Pakistani/Arabic called the in a nafiah liljins (whatever that is) and a subject (fa3il) I do not see Ali Dashti calling it the in here nafiah liljins or the bogus subject thing

Oh there is more

whereas it ought to be in the accusative HAADHAYNE because it comes after an introductory particle of emphasis

And any read that would like to check my pervious posts this is indeed what I wrote and oh there is more

the commentof a muslim scholar illustrates the fanaticism and intellectual ossification of later times "since in the unanimous opinion of the muslims the pages bound in the volume and called the qor'an are god's words and since there can be no error (he sounds like our dear Amin) in god's words the report that uthman and 'a'isha read hahdayne (and this is what i already wrote) instead of hahdan is wicked and false

folks it is all in black as this scholar is saying

1. The word in question is Hadhan and it is really an error

2. But in typical Muslim logic hadhayne is correct but Allah is always correct even if it is a mistake and what a hypocrite

3. Then he declares that both Uthman and 'Ai'isha must be wicked becuase they read it as hahdayne again typical muslim if you do not like what others are saying then you called them wicked or filthy as our dear Amin called me

Oh there is more

The tafsir al-jalalayn more temperately pretends that the dual suffix may be aane in all three cases (nominative, accusative, genitive)

What a bunch of hypocrites but notice that no one so far tell us about our dear Amin bogus in is a subject and his nafiah liljins right our dear Amin?

Oh there is more

yet the great ealy qor'an scholar and philologist abu amr b. al-'ala (D 770) read hadhayne as uthman and 'a'isha had done

So much for our dear Amin Pakistani/Arabic Shrah (sic) Jami (sic) that no Arab speaker in sane mind would use

And what a scandal he is calling 'Aisha and Uthman as wicked and if I care

So boys and girls it is all in black and white Allah made a mistake

You know our dear Amin it is silly to pretend to know Arabic when you do not and it is even big time foolish to take on a very old and celebrated mistake when you do not know any Arabic

Oh next? I will review al-Suyuit' s take on this little gem so get your Shrah (sic) ready

Now it is up to the readers to judge you and shame on you islam and muslims ask you to be a liar and play pretend is this good?

I urge you to leave islam and be free again

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".