Islamic hypocrisy revisited

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Sep 3, 2011 at 17:56

So you see our dear Amin whose Hindu ancestors were brutalized by Islam you told me that in hadhan (sic) lasahiran is correct grammar because and your bogus reasons were:

1. in nafiah (sic) leljins (sic) (ROTFL Pakistani Arabic). Mr Einstein in is not the one that is nafia lel jins and you are ignorant and even it is what does this have to do with the fact that in hadhan lasahiran is a mistake? you tell us

2. In is a subject (sic). Mr ignorant the mubtada' here or the subject is not in but hadhan ...

3. and there is a third cockamamie and gobbledygook reason which was just as stupid as the above two reasons

And all I did is I told you that Shiekh al-Azhar published a book called haqa'iq al-islam fi muwajahat shubahat al-mushakekeen (oh the Arabic? I do not translate Arabic for wannabe Arabs like you) where he and a bunch of your Arab masters in Egypt whose mother tongue is Arabic and they do address all these Quranic disasters and they need all the help that they can get.

And I suggested that you write him and tell him that you have the answer. But you know what? you are and you must pardon me a coward otherwise you would have contacted al-azhar

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".