Last Say on This Matter

Submitted by Amin Riaz (United Kingdom), Jul 16, 2011 at 23:12

Dhimmi spends a lot of time commenting on this website...... I however have a life to be getting on with. So this is my last post on this subject.

I have previously encountered dhimmi - and found him wanting - as his conversation style was to personally insult those (just Muslim commenters) and lie about them - stuff like being on benefit etc.

This subject was interesting so I had a go despite knowing his attitude. But I went round the argument. All he had to add to the argument was same this over and over again.

Dhimmi - has virtually no Arabic knowledge. He could not and failed to understand anything in Arabic. And refused to converse in Arabic. Whilst maintaining I had no knowledge of Arabic. Also he invented tis "Pakistani Arabic" to label me - despite me being ethnically Indian.

His knowledge comes from reading Western Islam scholars (non-Muslims) all of whom have their own differing agendas. And that is about it.

He was unable understand Arabic Syntactical Analysis - Arabic Grammar - or the system analysing grammar of Quran. So what chance did he have - previously when he has tried this method with other Muslim - they were not able to answer. But when some who could reply came along :-) Monsieur went off kilter.

A very childish style of his was that when was unable to counter and argument - he simply broke it into sections to render it meaningless - then pointing to the material with "gobbledygook" or "what has this to do with ....". This he used to

I have given him several chances to counter my arguments but little else came aside from repetition, insults, off topic comments.

His style of debate certainly is unique - as it is lying, insulting, bullish, completely ignoring material he does not comprehend, inability to present counter arguments, repeating same argument, making up stuff and being dogmatic & dogged.

Anyone with ounce of common sense will see who won this one, despite being Muslim or not.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".