On Ali Dashti

Submitted by Amin Riaz (United Kingdom), Jul 13, 2011 at 19:16

Is a stupid source to bring up. Dhimmi rejected all Grammarians of Classical Arabic. And brings up this unknown person up. He rejected ACTAUL grammar scholars to use this modern source?

He himself said Suyuti - even though syuti is not a Grammar Scholar - I defeted him on that. Now keep hammering on about Dashti - who he is well aware was rationalist shia. A useless reference.

I am not even bothering too look him up - after defeating him COMPREHENSIVELY on Suyuti (who mattered) - he got everything else wrong - he is probably even misquoting Dashti.

So if I do not know Arabic - where were your replies? Not one with credibility - other than banging on about an Inna - that does not even exist.

Just look in the Quran. Simple :-)

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".