GLARING and MASSIVE mistakes in the Qur'an! Oh the source? al-Azhar!

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Aug 6, 2011 at 09:37

This is straight from al-Azhar's book al-mushakekeen and you will find it on page 166 and if you our dear Amin al-tablighee who owns a Brand agency and who tells us it is fadih kabeer and not fadiha kabeera! What a karitha

Oh let me see so the mistake is called by al-Azhar

And this is for the readers and i'm only the messenger so if our dear Amin the lost tablighee does not like it he can write to al-Azhar and tell them that he disagrees and they will laugh at him

raf3 al-m3toof 3ala al-mansub

and if we read Qur'an surat al-ma'ida (and not Pakistani Arabic Surah Nisa) 69 it says (Oh and the readers can play spot the mistake with me0

ina al-ladhina aamanu

wa al-ladhina haduu

wa al-ssaabiuna (this is the mistake as we are told by al-Azhar)

wa al-nassara

Blah....blah....blah....

Now let us turn to Surat al-Baqara (and not the Pakistani Arabic Surah Baqarah!) 62 and let us read it

in al-ladhina aamanu

wa al-ladhina haddu

wa al-nasarra

wa al-ssaabiina (this is the correct version as we are told by al-Azhar)

Blah...blah....blah

It is either ssaabiina or ssaabiuna and it cannot be both

So which one is the correct version grammatically O graduate of Wahhabi central?

we are told by al-azhar that the second version is the correct one!

Do you know what this means our dear Amin who tells us that there is something called fadih kabeer (sic)

1. It means that Allah's command of Arabic garmmar is not consistent and that the first version is a mistake

Allah made a mistake so if we kuffar make mistakes then we must be in good company

2. Or if you read Wansbrough then this is a clear "variant tradition" and it means that the Qur'an must have multiple authors and one of the authors of this tradition made a mistake in grammar but not the second author

So much for the book of Allah

So what does al-Azhar stand on this big time disaster?

They are blaming the kuffar as usual!

Hello: it is a mistake...

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".