Oh the way out of this grammatical karitha (disaster) read and laugh

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Jul 16, 2011 at 07:57

For the readers notice that all I'm quoting is their Islamic sources that tell us that this is indeed a mistake and I call it silly when our dear Amin the graduate of a Wahhabi school has no clue about anything

But you know what? You think i should write them and tell them that their graduate Amin is mangling the Arabic language? What do you think?

Same as his sticking al- and claiming imaginary mistake. This is what you come up with when you have been ripped to intellectual shreds.You have had days to check this up on Internet. So why did you bother to ridicule me earlier for it.Now you have changed your mind - with less creditability than Clinton after being caught for the Lewinsky affair.If you were so good at Arabic..... why didn't you get this earlier. I wrote this 3 times - it is particle of negation of genus. And now you are admitting defeat - after it took you so long to learn from sheikh google.

What particle of negation nafia lel jins means to negate the gender and what gender and negate what? you tell us!

Oh there is more so we are told in response to this big disaster that 'A'isha was quoted as saying

hadha 3amal al-kuttab 'akhtauu fi al-kitab

Or This is the work (read this as mistakes) of the scribes they made mistakes in the book (read this as the Qur'an)

And what a disaster A'isha is admitting that there are mistakes in the Qur'an so you know more than 'A'isha ... ?

Oh there is more 'Uthman was quoted as saying

latughayiruha fa ina al-3arab satughyruha

Or do not change it (the mistakes in the Qur'an) because the Arabs will change it

What a scandal

Oh there is more

"Uthman who collected the Qur'an if we are to believe Muslims was also quoted as saying

'ara fiha lahnan wa satuqimahu al-3arab bialsinatiha faaqamahu bilisanihi wa taraka al-rasm 3ala halihi

Or i see mistakes in it and the arabs will fix it through their arabic dialects

Which means that Uthman was playing let us pretend and they are asking you to be a liar

But the ultimate was Abu Ubadya who was quoted as saying

in hadhayne lasahiran fi al-lafz wa kutiba hadhan kama yaziduna wa yanqasoona fi al-kitab wa al-lafz sawab

Or it is in hadhayne lasahiran in the wording or lafz but it is written as hadhani just as letters are added to and taken away from the book but pronounced wording remains preferable (see QS)

Or write as in hadhan but read it as in hadhayne

What a scandal

It is all in black and white they are asking you to play pretend and to be a liar

But this is what islam is all about

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".