One simple question?

Submitted by Amin Riaz (United Kingdom), Jul 31, 2011 at 04:50

This person {dhimmi_no_more} makes up stuff as he wishes - this whole post is a joke.

Why are you bothering to go over this whole Arabic thing - when you know you cannot understand the language when I clearly can?

One simple question?

Look at these few jokes:

1. wa akhawatiha - this bit means and its sisters - there is no rules by that name. This is Inna wa akhwati-ha - under the category Harf Mushbbah Bil Fai'l. This is not at the core o he sentence - as the particle does not belong to the class harf Mushabah bil fai'l but to Harf Nafi al-Jinns. According to most Arabic Grammarian.

We have gone through this several time and he still refuse to get this ON PURPOSE. He has read this in a book of Western critic. He does not know Arabic - clearly. Else why call this rule Wa Akhawatiha "and its sisters"

That is not the name OBVIOUSLY.

1. nafiah leljins what ever that is

2. in is a subject

3. in is not mushabbah bil or lel fail (sic) what ever that is

The above is summary of his mistake as quoted by him. Inna, Anna, Ka'inna, La-kinna, Layta and La'ala are the six particles known as Harf Mushabbah bil fa'il. Also known as Inna and its sisters. How come All arabic grammarians whose language it is are one side and a few

Virtually all reputable Western Scholars do not count this as mistake either or for any grammar mistake in the Quran. Including like of Goldzhier or Wansborough [especially countering Noldeke]. Dhimmi even refused to discuss this. Tha was 2 weeks ago when I asked. Again, all he is good at is repeating ONE thing over and over agian.

2. I do not know where this repeated "Pakistani" business come from. That is simply Racism. There is no such thing as pakistani Arabic - neither I am from Pakistan or its orgin. He just doesnt want to admit he comes from the same India as me. Ha.

Plus he fails to understand that Abd al-Sattar is writing notation used mainly by the English. To use Arabic in the text. Abd us-Sattar is the correct transliteration. The difference: If anyone one does not know Arabic - they would read abd al-Sattar as it is and would not know how to pronounce it.

Abd us Sattar is pronounced as it should be pronounced. This is a very very minute point - wit no conflict or mistake and try to blow this OUT of all proportions is useless.

only way to resolve - ask a third impartial person. Which obviouly dhimmi refuses - as he know he would lose. Clearly.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".