Whole post ... PROVEN EASILY

Submitted by Amin Riaz (United Kingdom), Sep 16, 2011 at 19:48

This whole post ... proven easily.

Our dear Amin also tells us that in hadhan lasahiran is correct grammar because in wa akhawatiha hurufa(n) mushabihata(n) bi al-fi3l as you see below right mr ignorant? And do you know what this means? In plain English it means that in wa akhawatiha are introductory particles as in truly now you tell us ya ayuha al-jahil al-kabeer what does this have to do with the fact that hadhan should be hadhayne? But I told you fine then send an e-mail to your arab master of choice and tell them this stupid reason and they will think that you are ignorant

I never said such thing - else post the link of the post where I said it. You have made it up. Same repition of one thing. We went through this and you lost.

I even gave our dear Amin the 9 reasons provided by his Arab masters to explain this mistake but non of them even sink that low and give us these crazy and stupid reasons that you provide and here we go:

Again a lie - he never did no such thing - else give links. H gave Suyuti - proved him wrong he never bothered to answer back.

Brought Ali Dashti - I went who? An obscure ex-Muslim? Who was Persian and not Arab.

إن " وأخواتها حروفا مشبهة بالفعل .

Where did you copy the above line from. Else you would have known huroofan should not have alif - the way you have posted it. As you has took it out of context - and is no longer mansoob.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".