The big Quranic disaster in hadhan (sic) revisited part five

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Sep 19, 2011 at 07:45

Our dear Amin tells us that in is nafia lel jins therefore in hadhan lasahiran is not a mistake right ...? then I quoted

س – ما هي ( لا ) النافية للجنس ؟ وما عملها ؟
- هي ( لا ) آلتي تنفي خبرها عن جنس اسمها نحو : ( لا قائد كسول ) ، فقد نفت الكسل عن جنس القادة .
- عملها : تعمل عمل ( إن وأخواتها ) ، فتنصب اسمها وترفع خبرها

>What the heck do you call this? Jeez!

I see you cannot read it right?

So - how come la li nafi al jinns was bogus -

ROTFL you cannot even read the Arabic right? So which one is nafia (and not your bogus nafi) lel jins you tell us and here goes your bogus claim that in is nafia lel jins (sic) and therefore in hadhan lasahiran is correct grammar

when it was there when you posted a children's grammar book as reference?

Oh I see you realized that you are ignorant and have nothing to say right?

Why is it I had to correct you on the rule?

What rule? that you are ignorant? we know that

The rule that you claim to be a mistake in the Quran.

Then tell us why it is not a mitake deal?one more time

>A rule that is not even applicable. Then you DID NO even know its name.

Shame on you for calling in nafia or was it in your bogus Arabic nafiah and then nafi lel jins

>I taught you that as well.How poor and embarrassing! Especially when you avoid all challenges to verify your or mine Arabic and make OBVIOUS lies.

The liar is he who pretends to know Arabic when he does not know any thing

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".