For sake of sanity.

Submitted by Amin Riaz (United Kingdom), Jul 13, 2011 at 19:08

Already answered - again:

Shrah Jami - (Jami) is name of the poet. its his commentary - this is a very very common style is Classical Arabic style - anyone with 1 years learning would have know this. Dhimmi EVEN got this wrong. Not surprising really.

Just look how ridiculous this reply is - all he could come up with was sticking al- in front of arabic words - ad suddenly he knows them - oh no he doesn't - Just read his previous posts where he said I dreamt these people up.

There is no such a thing as Pakistani Arabic - there is only one Classical Arabic. I have Bsc from London ad went on to King Saud.

THIS BIT IS HIGHLY HIGHLY INTERESTING.>Inna - is particle of empahsis this is not Inna - it is In - with silent nuun - a sukun.

So? what does this have to do with the fact that it should be hadhayne and not the big time mistake hadhan? you tell us? and in means truly mr ignorant and that is it so is truly a fa3il? you tell us

I am going to explain this the fifth time [you may read my previous post for other replies]

Right - this particle is not Inna - so if its not Inna - why should it be هذين ?

No Classical Arabic Grammarian says so. I have previously proved that. Simple as that really.

See even a non-Muslim source is un acceptable to him.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".