The 9 lame reasons given by Muslims to explain the big time Quranic disaster in hadhan (sic) lasahiran part deux

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Sep 21, 2011 at 08:31

Oh and here is another lame reason given by your Arab masters to explain this big time disaster in hadhan lasahiran and it is

ان بمعنى نعم

So does the word in mean yes? Let me help you it is not unless Ibn Manzur was a liar and why would the author of the Qur'an did not say

نعم هذن لسحرن

ooops let me fix the poor Quranic Arabic

نعم هاذان لساحران

If the author would have said that we kuffar would not have any case here but it is the poor Arabic in hadhan (sic) la sahiran

So much for the bogus claim that in means yes

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".