In Memory of Ali Dashti and you can prove him wrong

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Aug 6, 2011 at 07:37

Our dear Amin is more interested in his little syntactical analysis whatever that is and he can very well send it to al-Azhar and the answer will be

yanaharu eswid wa menayel bisiteen alf neela

Hello: I do not have to agree or disagree with you it is al-Azhar that counts and you know what? they will think that you must be a and you must padron me a nut case

I wrote

And remember that it was you who told us that in is a subject or maf3ul and in nafiah (sic) lel jins right? I'm only being the messenger

>Actually i never said anything of the sort - this is a delibrate lie. Easily proab from all previous comments.

Really? So what did you write?

So how can anyone like you ever claim any credibility? You used a simplistic school text book. Even that was beyond your level.

Oh the tablighee/deobandi topos of "I know the answer but I will not share it with you or the readers" what a fake

As you claimed - Harf Mushabbah Bil Fail is Har Mushabah Bil Fail Mabni

ROTFL Pakistani Arabic it is in Arabic

إن : حرف مشبه بالفعل مبني

And let me read it for you: in harf mushbah bi al-fi3l mabni which really means that in is an introductory particle of emphasis which really means truly and that is it and you can read it in my post about Ali Dashti and in hadhan lasahiran

You are ...a careless reader

So you tell us if in is not what grammarians tell us then what is it?

You need to stick to Urdu

And you told us not once but several times that in is not hard mushabbah (sic) bil (sic) fail (sic) right mr fake? but what does this have to do with the fact that in hadhan lasahiran is a mistake you tell us!

And if so so what is the in? See? this is where your poor islamic education betrays you

Which it isn't.

I will leave this remark to the readers to judge you

You also told us that in is nafiah (sic) leljins (sic) right? when in wa akhawatiha is

"إنَّ و أنَّ ولكنَّ وكأنَّ ولَيْتَ ولَعلَّ ولا النافيةُ للجنس

And what I told you it is nafia and not nafiat so which one is the nafia lel jins and what does this have to do with the fact that in hadhan lasahiarn is a mistake you tell us?

You also told us that in is a subject right? and when I asked you to tell us what is al-fi3l wa al-fa3il wa al-maf3ul you had no clue right? You know they will laugh at you at al-Azhar if you repeat this nonsense

It took you over 2 weeks and you are still getting basics wrong over and over again.

What basics? That you are boring and really ignorant and delusional? But you are

So go and tell them this nonsnse at al-Azhar and they will laugh at you

And you know what? you can prove Ali Dashti to be wrong but we kuffar can prove that your Allah is the one who made this mistake of in hadhan lasahiran

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".