in wa akhawatiha and Quranic mistakes and the in hahdan (sic) la sahiran

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Jul 13, 2011 at 08:10

This is for the readers as this is beyond that our dear Amin the deobandi/yablighee and i hate to get into big time Arabic grammar but he made me do it and this is straight from Sibawyhe's Arabic grammar and it is the so called ina wa akhawatiha rule

Now the recension is

In Hahdani Lasahirani

1. Now the in is called the introductory particle of emphasis and it really means truly

2. The word Hadhan is called mubtada' or the introductory clause

3. The word lasahiran is a khabar or the event

So the structure of the jumla (sentence) is introductory particle of emphasis, mubtada' and then al-khabar

Now let us read the ina wa akhawatiha rule

Sharh qa3idat in (the explaining of the In rule)

1. Qa3idat in kama na3rif tansub al-mubtada' wa tarfa3 al-khabar

Or: The rule as we know it put al-mubtada' in the accusative case and al-khabar is marfu3

2. famathlan idha qulna hahdan tilmidhan

For example if we say these two are (two) students

3. Hadhan mubtada' marfu3 bi al-alif wa al-nuun li inaha muthana

Or hadhan (these two) is mubtada' marfu3 with the alif and nuun (the last two letters of the word)

4. Tilmidhan khabar marfu3 bi al-alif wa al-nuun li inaha muthana

Or the khabar or the tilmidhan is marfu3 with the alif and nuun (just like the mubtada') becuase it is in the dual case

5. Wa 3indama tadkhul in 3ala al-jumla

And when in (the introductory particle of emphasis) is introduced in the sentence

6. tansub al-mubtada faqat

The mubtada only will be in the accusative

7. fatakun al-jumla hakadha

and the sentence will be as follows

8. in hadhayne tilmidhan

in then hadhayne in the accusative and the khabar is left as is

9. Tansub al-mubtada' hadhayne wa 3alamat al-nasb al-ya' wa al-nuun li inha muthana

al-Mubtada' will be in the accusative and the sign of the nasb are the letters yeh and nuun because it is in the dual

10. wa yabqa al-khabar marfu3an tilmidhan

And the khabar remains in the nominative case or tilmidhan

Et Voila

In Hadhan (sic) la sahiran must be

In Hadhayne la sahiran

Go and ask one of your masters the Arabs to check what I wrote

What a fadiha Allah had no clue about in wa akhawatiha

It is your islamic sources and books of grammar that are saying that so if you do not like it then destory your garmmar books and good riddance

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".