Riaz ... ,IF YOU CAN'T SUBSTANTIATE!!!

Submitted by Nur el Masih Ben Haq (United States), Jul 2, 2011 at 03:21

Since you have woefully failed to cite the specific Answering Islam material I supposedly copied from, and the only source you were able to cite, to your disappointment and embarrassment, turned out to be mine, I hereby dismissed your failed efforts as diversionary...

I PROVED MY CLAIMS; YOU FAILED YOURS!!

You babbled that I can't prove, using Islamic scriptures, that Palestine belongs to the Jews while Saudi Arabia belongs to Arabs as I had said. So I responded by citing the relevant Quranic and Hadith reference. On the other hand, you couldn't use the Qur'an or Hadith to counter my proof. So what are you?

Yet you had the liver to say:

"And you still fail to answer all that I ask you. You sound so much like Dhimmi - another ranter."

Let me tell you Riaz, you are not anywhere near Dhimmi no more in terms of scholarly soundness credibility. Dhimmi substantiates every iota of his claims – at times using the language of original expression. In short Riaz, you are intellectually a drop in the ocean of Dhimmi no more!

YOU JUST ACCUSE ME OF DOING WHAT YOU MUSLIMS DO

For long Muslims have been imitating one another by using basically the same simplistic logic to challenge the Christian doctrine of The Holy Trinity; son of God and so on. And of late, Muslims like Ahmad Deedat and co. plagiarized various works of Western atheists depicting the Holy Bible as contradictory. Yet whenever Muslims use works not originally theirs to prove a point, we don't waste time giving excuse that it is not their original work; we face the issue raised and tackle it. This is because works being somebody's doesn't change the fundamental fact of the case.

BRACE UP FOR MORE ERRORS IN ISLAMIC SCRIPTURES

Riaz, I have realized that you are jittery about embarrassing errors in your scriptures partly for which reasons you try to blackmail critics away from citing the blunders of your scriptures. Well, your tricks will not work with me.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".