Riaz, I CHALLENGE YOU (or any Muslim) FOR A DEBATE ON ANY TOPIC OF YOUR CHOICE

Submitted by Nur el Masih Ben Haq (United States), Jul 10, 2011 at 03:10

You said:

"….to hold a proper conversation or argument."

My response:

OK henceforth I will answer you point by point. And if that is not a proper discussion again, you can suggest the pattern. The fact is that it is you that is afraid of proper conversation, debate argument or proper discussion.

You said:

"Even if you are NOT Dhimmi - you are so alike - ramblers. Why is it you cannot hold a conversation, debate argument?"

My Response:

I am NOT Dhimmi, your debate demolisher and teacher of the language of your enslavers, the Arabs. And like I said, I am challenging you for a debate on any topic of your choice and pattern of your preference.

You said:

"Your previous comments were worse than your copy and paste job. You made something up - ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha - one read and I laughed my head off! I never thought I would say - even dhimmi came up with something more .... substantial."

My Response:

This is a typical and usual apologetic rant of a defeated Muslim debater. If a Muslim is defeated in a debate, he'll in a way start blaming some likely website for providing his Christian defeater with points superior to his. Come on, when shall you people grow and stop making yourself look ridiculous. If you can't identify the alleged source site, stop sounding like a coward.

You said:

"You do not know the Arabic language. So how do you know when something is a grammatical error or not. In your comments - you said something is grammatical error - but you failed to point it out - what EXACTLY is a grammatical error and why?"

My response:

Which Arabic? Is it the Pakistani/Hindo- pidgin Arabic which you speak or the normal Arabic? Any way, don't bring another diversionary tactics; what is at stake is NOT Arabic. We can use Arabic when the situation warrant; but not as a means of denying other readers the menu of the debate. Secondly , the following is a grammatical error:

Qur'an 3:45. Behold! the angels said: "O Mary! Allah giveth thee glad tidings of a Word from Him: his name will be Christ Jesus, the son of Mary, held in honour in this world and the Hereafter and of (the company of) those nearest to Allah.

46. "He shall speak to the people in childhood and in maturity. And he shall be (of the company) of the righteous."

47. She said: "O my Lord! How shall I have a son when no man hath touched me?" He said: "Even so: Allah…."

The Error

In case you still want to pretend not to see the error, here the grammatical error is the angels are later introduced as "he." The fact is that the fabricator(s) of this verse, who must be human being(s) was composed.

According to Qur'an 11:42-43, Noah's son was drawn. But according to Qur'an 21:76 and Qur'an 37:77 Noah and his family were saved.

To the above you said:

"I think you meant to say drowned. Here either you have blatantly lied or are not have never actually fully read the book. There are also verses that say - God says to Noah - that son is not a member of the family. Even without it this DOES not count as mistake."

My response:

Yes! It is drowned and not drawn. Please cite the verse and let us see what it really says. Be serious!

According to Qur'an 3:45 Allah sent ANGELS to Mary; but according to Qur'an 19:17 Allah sent one ANGEL to Mary.

To the above, you said:

"God has many many angels - thousand probably visited Mary mother of Christ. The one angel is always Gabriel - chief of the angels. Its 9 months or so - duration of a pregnancy. One instance does not have bearing on the other. Plus anyone can go read all those verse you point out - for example 3:45 is totally different setting then that of 19:19 - so how does it constitute as mistake."

My response:

You have exposed your pathetic state of helplessness here. You preferred to pretend to be confused and ignorant about the nature of the Qur'an because you don't know what to say.

You said:

"No - you have invented and made up things. Plus its proven to you - not proved. They hardly are but may I suggest learn English and then Arabic. I think you are teenager - the way you use language and the way you argue. It is childish."

My response:

You can't even

Let me tell you, fellow readers would agree with me that you are one of the most grammatically poor guys here. Your constructions are ridiculously poor. I don't waste time talking about it because that is not the issue at stake.

Don't forgot I am waiting for the debate topic (ANY TOPIC).

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".