More Quranic disasters read and laugh

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Aug 26, 2011 at 08:57

Oh and while we are aiting for our dear Amin to provide us with a link to wahhabi central so we can verify that he is really a glorious graduate with majisteer fi al-lugha al-3arabiyya and while waiting for my ticket on al-buraq so i can fly to London so our dear Amin and I can converse in Arabic I have one more Quranic disaster and it seems that as you shall see you our dear Amin and Allah seem to have big time confusion about al-mu'anath wa al-mudhakar so let me remind the readers that our dear Amin the glorious graduate of wahhabi central told me that الفضيحة الكبيرة is really فضيح كبير and what a fake as no child would make such a mistake as the word fadiha is mu'anath but it seems that Allah also has the same difficulty so let us turn to Surat الاعراف 56 where it says ولاتفسدوا في الأرض بعد اصلاحها وادعوه خوفاً وطمعاً إن رحمة الله قريب من المحسنين

ya nahar eswid so let me fix Allah's poor Arabic إن رحمة الله قريبة من المحسنين
I just fixed Allah's poor Arabic

Oh the mistake? now we turn to kitab al-mushakekeen published by your masters at al-Azhar and on page 186 we find the glorious Quranic mistake and the mistake is in their words تذكير خبر الاسم المؤنث
ya khrabi we have a mistake here and here is "the syntactial analysis" by your masters at al-Azhar on page 186 and it goes as follows الخطأ كلمة قريب وهي خبر اسم إن رحمة الخطأ نحوياً منشؤه عدم التطابق بين المبتدأ رحمة والخبر قريب في التأنيث لأن المبتدأ رحمت مؤنث أما الخبر قريب فهوا مذكر

ya nahar eswid Allah cannot tell the difference between al-mu'anath wa al-mudhakar so you are in good company our dear Amin because you seem to share this big disaster with Allah

So when we do our lunch with him we need to talk to him about al-mu'anath wa al-mudhakar and you can ask him your and you must pardon me your stupid question how come fadiha is mu'anath and do not forget Allah does not know any Pakistani Arabic

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".