What a fadiha and karitha and mistakes in the Qur'an

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Jul 14, 2011 at 06:54

Our dear Amin the lost deobandi tablighee is debating a question isn a lnguage that he cannot speak read or write and for the readers notice that he never even tell us why the word hadhan should in the nominative you tell us ...

>You have never ever read any of Jalal Uddin Syuti's work.

Oh yes it is all there in al-Itiqn

So he tells us that and this is one way out of this Islamic karitha (disaster)

He tell us that it is hadhan because in some dialects as in b kinana and b harith al-muthana (oh I forgot that you do not know any Arabic) or the dual is expressed by alif which means that it should be hadhan in all three forms

What a fadiha (scandal) this means that there is no nominative, accusative or genetive cases in Arabic so is that true? And mosr significant why would Muhammad not fix the poor Arabic of some ignorant Arabs you tell us?

The truth is it is a big karitha (disater) that Allah has no clue about a very basic Arabic language grammar rule in wa akhawatiha and your masters are ttrying to fix the mess

What a scandal

>He is just below the rank of Abu Hanifa, Shafi, Malik and Ibn Hanbal.

So? He knows his Arabic so did you read what he is saying about this Islamic disaster?

>Although a perfect grammarian - but is not know for being a Grammarian. Is a highly respected Islamic Scholar. You do not for second either respect him at all. Its your position you are protecting.

gobbeldygook

>All you have picked up his from western critics - that somehow twist andNot for one millisecond Syuti agrees with whatever bullshit you come up with - neither are most of your references correct. Its twisted wrds - for someone who misquotes my posts - right in front of me.

What a scandal Allah cannot tell the difference between the accusative and the nominative! He flunks his derassat qawa3id wa nahw l-lugha al-3arabiyya

>Ibn Hisham

Did you read him? and can you prove us readers with the name of his kutub? and Why do I need Ibn Hisham when i can read Sibawayhe? you tel;l us but lost tablighees like to drop names right our dear Amin the lost tablighee so did you read his word? In Arabic? why the delusions?

>and Abu Bakr Nahwi

ROTFL His name is al-Nahwi ya lahwiti ya kharabi but like a typical tablighee you have no clue about al al-ta3reef

>are top Arabic Grammarians alongside Ibn Sibwayah. Over 1000 years OBVIOUSLY Arabic has many grammarians.

More gobbledygook

>Here is more of you lies - how do you know I am for example a "tablighee" - you have done this countlessly.

More selfhate I see

Here is ina wa akhawtiha

ina wa akhawatiah tarfa3 al-mubtada' wa tansub al-khabar which means that

Hadhan (sic)

Should be

Hadhayne -

>This is not even true - absolute BS - simple why dont you ASK Dr Daniel Pipes. See if you can get an opinion?

Nt we are waiting for your opinion mr masters degree in Arabic and stay tuned for my translation of ina wa akhwatiha that i posted yesterday

sharh qa3idat in

Notice that he has no clue about my transliterated Arabic right our dear Amin al-tablighee?

I posted it yesterday and i still do not see it

>Obviously - you wont - I know for a FACT I am simply 100% right.

I'm 100% right that you are no more than another victim of the imperialism of the Arabs and no more

>In a post I have alread - completely destroyed all your arguments - and unlike you I have a life to live.

I will leave this to the readers to judge you and shame on you in is not a subject and your cockamamie nafia liljins (nafia or tanfi al-jins) where is the jins (for the readers jins in Arabic means gender) in this recension mr einstein? you tell us

>Anyone can check - there are hunderds and thousands of online Quran - this particle is written as Ann - with a silent sukun.

Hello: sukun means no short vowels you are really ignorant

Oh this is another gobbeldygook explanation for this very fact that Allah made a mistake

Let me expalin it to the readers again so we are told by Muslims that because there is a sukun above the nuun then in wa akhawatiha as a grammatical rule becomes ineffective in tarfa3 al-mubtada' wa tansub al-khabar or that the word hadhan should be read as hadhan

But this is bogus and do you know why?

1. The rasm the words of your Allah have no short vowels or sukun and you know what this means? It would mean by the same logic that the in wa akhwatiha as a rule in grammar is not effective for anything do you get it but this is not true right?

2. Where would i find in Sibawayhe and you will read his explanation that

al- sukun fi al nuun yubatilu qa3idat in wa akhawatiha

Let me translate it for you

al-sukun (no short vowel) in the nuun abolishes the (grammatical effect) of in wa akhwatiha

Where would i find it in Sibawayhe? But wiat ignorant Arabs that were trying to explain this big time mistake came up with the following

jazm in

in 3aliyha sukun yubatilu 3amaliha

But this is bogus because if this is true the a sentence like

in hadhan tilmidhan

Is correct Arabic which is far from the truth and it should be

in hadhayne tilmidhan

But again Arabic hypocrisy has no limits

Simple

The siple fact is you are debating a language that you cannot read speak read or write I call this silly

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".