Mistakes in the Qur'an

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Jul 15, 2011 at 06:36

our dear amin is not aware that we kuffar only tell him what his islamic sources are saying and if he does not like it then destroy them and good riddance

>Inna and its sisters

NO it is qa3idat in

do not apply here I have posted a lengthy debate - plus i proved it from Suyuti's writing. Nor major Classical Arabic grammarian thought so either.This particle is always written as An - and never as Inna - as he claims check the Quran - this is no celebrated mistake - its only that few poor western scholars have made it so. Top of the line western scholars don't even bring it up - else name them? Let see how many.

Oh the blame the dog excuse

Mr Einstein we are told by no other than kutub al-turath al-islami books that you cannot read in Arabic that the way out of this grammatical karitha (disater) and i did post it two days ago but I do not see the post

1. Jazm An in 3aliyha sukun yubatal 3amaliha.

2. hadhhi lughatu na3d al-3arab

3. al-alif fi hadhan men jawhar al-kalima.

4. in ta'ti bima3na ajal

5. maqbl harf al-tathniyya maftuh

6. in al-ha' mudammara.

7.in bima3na na3am

8. in bima3na ma

9. al-alif wa al-ya' fi al-qira'a sawa'

What a joke

Now you have them but here is a grammar question for you if the word should be hadhan

then you tell us and this is an open book question

Fix the grammar in the following sentence

in hadhan latilmithan

hint; any student of arabic who writes such sentence he will get a zero in grammar and let me fix it

in hadhayne latilmithan

What a scandal Allah had no clue about the nominative and accusative

------

>Again - I wrote on nafi al jinns - anyone with elementary knowldge of classical arabic knows it.

ROTFL No you did not you wrote nafiah liljins right? and i fixed it as nafia lel jins or it cancels the gender what ever that is but again you have no clue about al al-ta3reef ! and where is the jins in this sentence? so you are learing from kuffar like me right?

You tell us what does nafia lel

http://www.danielpipes.org/comments/187244

>Apparently

apparentely what? that you are ignorant that keep changing what he says as we go

-----

>Same Suyuti - Dhimmi praised - I used him to turn tables on him - agin here is a comprehensive reply:

Then prove him wrong he for knew more Arabic than you will ever know his first language was arabic you? you play pretend

http://www.danielpipes.org/comments/187244

-------

>Ali Dashti is nonsensical reference - I have already rejected it - considering i took Suyuti away from you - that is scraping the barrel.

then prove him wrong and I did help you and see above for every nonsense that is in your sources about this little mistake

-------

Dhimmi's reply was completely wrong. As he does not even know what a "Subject" of a verb is. Even in English.

mr ignorant you called in subject ! Right? what a fadiha

rather than deal with it - he is reapeating himself - the same nonsense.

what nonsense that allah made a mistake and he had no clue about the accusative v. nominative cases

what a karitha

Second I called on to him to bring an impartial judge to satisfy this matter - but no response on that fron either.

what impartial judge! stop your delusions

PS - here is comprehensive reply to Dhimmi - for which he had no answer for.ttp://www.danielpipes.org/comments/187178

oh that allah did not make a mistake and how dare you debate a subject in a language that you cannot speak read or write?

-----

just because you have read - Robert Spencer, Answering Islam website and probably J Wansbrough - doesn't make you expert in Arabic - that is the reason keeps repeating this Inna and its sister - and has not shown one other thing he knows about Arabic.

Really Robert Spencer about it? Could you give us the link or is this tablighee BS?

hello your allah made a mistake period

What a fadiha

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".