"fallacious argument sTs"

Submitted by Lactantius Jr (United Kingdom), Oct 21, 2008 at 07:57

To sTs

You fail to deal with Colonel Gadaffi's claims about Barack Hussein Obama's religious identity by producing evidence against them, and seeking to discredit Gadaffi with an abusive ad Hominem attack against him, fails to disprove his claims, and is flawed because Gadaffi's character has no bearing on the validity of his claims.

Speaking of your co-religionist as a "crazy spoiled boy" may or may not be an accurate description of him, but even "crazy spoiled boys" can tell the truth.

With kind regards and best wishes

Lactantius Jr

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".