a Cliche can never prove a point

Submitted by sTs (United Arab Emirates), Oct 22, 2008 at 01:13

First of all Shari'a law is not applied in any country, even so, Islam is flourishing, therefore your reasoning that without Shari'a laws, the prophets words would fade away is wrong.

The fact is Islam is more than Shari'a law, I can say that Shari'a is part of Islam but not the whole Islam, therefore your reasoning again is wrong and Islam is truely expanding worldwide.

If you call Bernard Shaw a radical then you must also call all many of the famous people who asserted Islam and converted to Islam to be Radicals, and there are many. among them are Priests of the church , Doctors, scientists, philosophers, leaders...... you name it, there they are.

Until now you are not able to proof that the bible is not corrupt, while we proved to you that the bible is corrupt, text and history, but you still stick to it and its wrong doctrine.

I urge you to start looking at the whole issue objectivly not in a stubborned closed mind.

Mohammad never denied Jesus Christ as a holy Prophet and never denied God as the Supreme only creator of the word.

Nura have explained in perfect way the relation and attributes of God that Jesus cannot be one of them

Keith Williams also questioned how can God take his own life on the cross by himself and raise himself from the dead. there are good points and questions that Christians cannot answer.

A cliche can never prove a point

I read many testimonies of Christians converted to Islam were wondering when chirldren about many of the illogical teaching in the Bible and Christianity and specially about the trinity and because of the childhood confusion, they turn to Islam in later years.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".