Keith Willaims: Islamic all the way. Accusations without substance

Submitted by Plato (India), Nov 11, 2008 at 20:52

Keith, you wrote:

>>sTs is right and you are wrong. If you don't agree then that is fine.<<

You could have shown where I was wrong and sTs correct. I will agree if I can read your reasons and if they are reasonable.

>> Don't bash Islam and don't bash the Holy Qur'an because of your lack of understanding.<<

Is pointing out the Koran is one monotonous litany against other faiths Islam bashing? If so then it is Islam bashing. As to lack of understanding, it may well be true as I do not claim to know Arabic or read all the original sources. If this is your complaint then no one not even scholars can understand it as evidenced by the fact that there are violent disagreements among them.

>> I would caution all that if you don't understand something especially when it comes to God and the hereafter then you should err on the side of caution ….<<

The Islamic warning sign is up. You better tiptoe around Allah (and Muhammad) or else….

>>….and not on the side of hatred and ignorance thereby bringing shame and wrath of God on your soul.<<

Can you show me where I have shown hatred in this post. What I have shown is Allah's hatred towards a man and his wife who abused His prophet who had been abusing their religion. And in the best Islamic tradition you turn that around and say I am the one showing hatred!

Regards

Plato

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".