Masood - I suggest you read what was actually written before replying

Submitted by the Grand Infidel of Kaffiristan (Australia), Nov 28, 2008 at 21:53

Masood writes:

"So, please don't distort truth and do not put your opinion unless you comprehend what I am trying to explain.."

Before you start telling me what I should be doing I suggest you re-read what I wrote in:

http://www.danielpipes.org/comments/143891

which was in response to your assertions in :

http://www.danielpipes.org/comments/143846

where the implications are that sex for children is OK and can be accommodated in our societies.

Notice that I was not speaking about a 53 year old 'prophet' sleeping with a nine year old girl - nor was I speaking about one individual 8 year old girl mentioned in 'Ganiz Book of Reccords'.

You gave an example in
"...So what about a girl which is 6 or 7 and start making sexual contacts with a boy two years older than her. That is fine according to our civilized culture. Now they keep enjoying relation until boy turns 18 and she 16."

I gave my clear response that such a girl could have children at 13 - not like the father any more (because they both had not develo[ed their respective personalties at such an early age for one thing) , not complete her basic education , then tries to find security in a series of broken relationships - ending uup with multiple children from mutliple fathers. And then I point out that this becomes a burden on society in general, especially on the social security system.

At no stage did I twist anything you said. You seem to be upset because I've stated the obvious - that quite apart from the moral implications , you had not thought out the long-term ramifications of allowing children to have sex..

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".