The strange case of Keith

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Nov 13, 2008 at 07:12

Hi Plato Now you will discover that Keith's (sic) respose to you will be: Allah will punish you for saying so which I read as: Keith realizes that he has nothing to say. He reminds me of Khaled and the funny thing about those paki/tablighee like him (and he is Paki/tablighee and he is not a convert or a Keith either and I can tell as he uses the usual topoi of Paki/tablighees) is that they all sound the same and they all repeat the same drivel. What is amazing about his likes is that he debates a language that he cannot read, speak or write and that is Arabic. As for the Quranic word makkar or he who decievs if he knew his Arabic he would have known what this word really means and his bogus claim that the meaning of such word have changed is fraudulent. The Qur'an is literature/scripture and this very fact stablizes such word as makkar and makkar of 1400 years ago is the makkar of today but again I'm always amazed about the poor and uncritical education of Pakistanis but again what do you except from a graduate of a madrassa

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".