Vijay: The fundamental things apply.

Submitted by IamJoseph (Australia), Apr 6, 2010 at 19:57

'Diglossics' aside, there are no Arabic books pre-400 CE, making everything Islamic a recent phenomenon relative to a host of other peoples's histories in Arabia. This makes the notion of Arabian as varied from Arab. Further, most of the states presently called Arab Islamic - are also the most recent emergence in Arabia, not to forget 'fictional' - none of them existed 120 years ago - and this makes the notion of 'sacred Islamic soil' - aside from egocentric - also bogus. No need to discuss the laughable premise of 'Muslim Palestineans' which emerged in 1965 after the Pope shook hands with Arafat - the Vatican being the closest office to know this name was first dumped on the Jewish homeland [Judea] - not any Arab or Islamic one; this was clearly inclined on genocide of a certain people Europe had a problem with. The term Judas better fits those who commited grave crimes for 30 barrels of oil? Try to produce a suitable adjective to describe this farce and grammar, first introduced in the world's first alphabetical book [The Torah], becomes problematic here. The mayhem for humanity and the world today has no other source than Briton's creation of those ficticious Regimes. Period. Israel is the only savier of humanity in shining this light to the nations. Restoring the Balfour is encumbent and directly fulcrumed to humanity's future by its commonsense 'principle' - the world has no need of a new golf course on soccer sized Israel - unless we can invent a new word for PC Genocide, which will be an encroaching phenomenon for the rest of the world. Semantics should not change history or where disaster points. Europe commited a grave crime with the Jews - and this is a reflective phenomenon.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".