our dear iam al-munafiq al-kabeer and his so called experts

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), May 1, 2010 at 15:16

Our dear iam told us that there was no Arabs before 400CE and when he was reminded of Herodotus' Arabs and the Arabs of the Periplus (oh I forgot he had no clue what is really the periplus) he chnaged his mind and told us that he meant that there were no Arabs before 500BCE but would he admit, god forbid, that his claim was bogus? No and I call this dishonesty.

As for his forays in languages that he does not read speak or write (Egyptian, Arabic, Egyptian Arabic and Syriac) and his less than perfect command of English is really pathetic

Then when he was told that we have extant Arabic language inscriptions as early as BCE in Qarayat al-Faw and in 88-150CE from isreal. He told us that this must be all made up. And when he was told that we have literary evidence from the Qur'an that parts of the Qur'an must have been from texts that pre-dates Muhammad by hundrerds of years (eg: al-layka ayka) he just deleted it and you think that i did not notice our dear iam?

As for "argument from silence" he had no clue what it is but that does not stop him ...

And he also told us that the Arabs had no kings before his magic 400CE, I provided him with an Arabic language inscription from the year 328CE and it is the tomb of an Arab king he changed his mind again as you shall see and this is what he wrote

>This is the true reason we find no Arabic writings before 300-400 CE,

Oh the year 300CE then there were indeed Arabic language before your bogus 400CE right? What a hypocrite

For the readrers in another post he tells us that 300CE is close enough to 400CE his magic bogus year. And you know what our dear iam? you sound like Muslims when they would tell us ya3ni bel taqrip or oh close enough. You lived among Muslims for too long

>a relatively recent date, while all other true ancient writngs can be seen.

Hello: How about 'En 'Avadat? and how about Qaryat al-Faw?

>It is also the reason we find no kings,

How about Amru al-Qays Malik al-3Arab? Or did you forget?

>cities, wars, monuments of ARABS in Arabia pre-500 BCE.

So? and there were no Amercian cities either as far as we know unless you have some cockamamie theory here

>The 3 examples given in this forum, as claims for ARABS pre-500 BCE are falsified and incorrect -

Oh one of them was the Bible! So is the Bible falsified? I guess Muslims say that the Bible is kitab muharraf right ?

Oh and go and tell them at Hebrew University that such evidence for the existence of the Arabs in 900BCE as falsified. You know what they will tell you? They will tell you then write a book and prove it falsified but until then to and you must pardon me: shut up

>they do not mention ARAB nor do they display a clear thread of imprints since those dates -

Then write a book and tell the world that Resto and Hoyland and Vesrteegh are all wrong and I promise you you will be making a fool of yourself

>most scholars agree these claims cannot be verified and are assumptions only.

Could you name a name or two? And if you tell them this as Hebrew University they will laugh at you

># Yes. But how will that help when you refute all the facts already given you?

Could you name the names of those so called scholars? I will be waiting for your answer with great anticipation

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".