ARAB IS NEW; ARABIAN IS OLD.

Submitted by IamJoseph (Australia), Apr 26, 2010 at 23:26

Hello: Are you also aware that in some Arabic language dialects ani also means I !!! Oh let me guess: they stole it too right?

Yes, I know that ana and ani, the male/female gender applies here, and that ani is also I in Arabic. But the relavent factor is ANO does not apply as Arabic. While both Hebrew and Arabic have a similar word to the ancient Egyptian - the stand out factor here is that we have ancient Hebrew independently as ANI adjacent to ancient Egyptian - but no Arabic. This says the Arabic writings, which emerged only in 400 CE [at least after 300 CE], is not an original language but an admix of many ancient dialecs.

We know also that the original Egyptians are not Arab and never spoke Arabic - which clearly explains why Arab and Arabian are two different phenomenons. The Greeks, when they invaded Arabia, were not familiar with the various Arabian groupings in this region, and when the Arab peoples emerged, they called them Arabs - a shortened coinage for Arabian. The Coptics, kurds, Jews - who predate the Arab grouping, all became Arab - which is dis-historical.

This is the true reason we find no Arabic writings before 300-400 CE, a relatively recent date, while all other true ancient writngs can be seen. It is also the reason we find no kings, cities, wars, monuments of ARABS in Arabia pre-500 BCE. The 3 examples given in this forum, as claims for ARABS pre-500 BCE are falsified and incorrect - they do not mention ARAB nor do they display a clear thread of imprints since those dates - most scholars agree these claims cannot be verified and are assumptions only. The same applies with Islamic states created by Briton, such as Iraq, Saudi Arabia, the Gulf states and Jordan - these are all new and never existed 150 years ago - they were created with oil borders, in secret, and given to one family's members - very different from Israel.

Anok Pe (or Coptic alpha Nu O kappa Pi Ey)

Oh references?:

1. I urge the readers to check "The Gospel of Thomas" check verse 61 where it says "I am ..." and this is in Sahidic Coptic which would have been the dialect of the Pharaohs

2. Check Crum dictionary

3. And here is your bonus from Bohairic Coptic and for this see Nabil Mattar's book "Bohairic Coptic" and for this see page 176 and I am which in Egyptian language is I the one or I am and it is

Anok Pe

----------------------------------------

# Again, there is denial and deflection here. While the word I [ANO] may have different forms, specially with today's modern Coptics, the word ANO being Egyptian is irrefutable as also one of the forms of I in the Egyptian language. There is none better to say so than the Hebrew bible and the Jews: they were in ancient Egypt, clearly mentioned in an Egyptian stelle and they have advanced alphabetical books of Egypt's terrain and history, including its belief systems, its kings, rivers, diets, politics, cities, monuments, etc. The Hebrew bible is not comprobable with the Quran - it predates and gives accurate historical factors, as opposed being based on 'belief".

The Arabs have absolutely nothing about ancient Egypt, and have been ruining that country by erasing all relics which negates history in that land; they have been doing the same in Palestine - destroying sites which predate Islam and the Arab race, such as Joseph's 4000 year tomb, historical relics in the temple mount, and telling its peoples Jews must be forbidden in Jerusalem and Hebron - the very birthplaces of Judaism and Monotheism. We see this Islamic trait even in places like India, where sacred Hindu sites were destroyed and mosques dumped on it - the same was seen recently with the Buddha relics in Afghanistan - these are crimes against humanity's heritage.

The Arabs who became Islamic, know about Abraham and Moses only from the Jews - yet they call Jews as infidels and a blessing to kill. Freedom fighters must start at home - Muslims must engage their rulers and teachers to stop parading false blood libels, the Protocols, Jews never had a homeland and Capital, etc. There is no such thing as BELIEF or Godliness when such lies are accepted so impudently.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".