BIG FONTS - BIG DENIALS.

Submitted by IamJoseph (Australia), May 6, 2010 at 20:26

Hello: there is no Coptic language there is Egyptian language written in Greek letters with added 6 consonants that did not exist in the Greek alphabet (and this is what Coptic is all about ) and you are ignorant and shame on you

-------------------------------------------------

# There is a language spoken by coptics which is varied from Arabic. That this was written with Greek letters does not impact: many such cases are seen, because at that time there was no alphabetical writings for most languages. Even the Greeks never had alphabetical writings at one time - they got their alpha-beta from the Hebrew alef-bet ['The Flavius Josephus documents']. Your own previous admission there was oral Arabic affirms this. We also have the ancient Aramaic transcribed in alphabetical Hebrew, sections of which are seen in the passover liturgy - this says the Aramaic is ancient and proven by the ancient Hebrew alphabetical writings. But we have no example of Arabic written in Hebrew, or any arabic whatsoever - adjacently transcribed to the Coptic or Aramaic language - or in any other form whatsoever.

There is coptic and Aramaic - but there is NO ARABIC! Shouting with big fonts does not make you correct.

The Coptics are the original natives of Egypt - their land stolen by Arabs who emerged much later. Today, the Coptics are persecuted, their language forbidden. Likewise, the Jewish land was stolen, a tradition seen of Islam in India and many places in the East and Far-East. Muslims cannot accuse anyone of stealing lands. Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, all the Gulf states - never existed 150 years ago - Israel did. The Arabic language never existed pre-400 CE - the Hebrew did. The Arab race per se never existed pre-500 BCE - the Hebrew nation did, as also the Coptics, the Kurds, the Indians - did. The poster has not given this forum any proof to the contrary - all the links provided have been responded to - with abject denials.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".