MORE ERRORS REPEATED.

Submitted by IamJoseph (Australia), Jun 9, 2010 at 00:31

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Jun 5, 2010 at 15:35

For the readers read and laugh as our dear iam tells us that there is something great about the letter v and that it is only in Hebrew and my response was: wrong as in the language of Egypt the second letter of the alphabet is beta or veta and I gave him the example of the name of the city of Coptos (Greek) or Kipt (Egyptian /Coptic) , in Late Antique Egypt, was Arabized by Egyptians as QIFT and the f in Qift comes from the fact that the Copts who Arabized the name read the letter P in Coptos or Kipt as Arabic B because there is no letter P in Arabic but the letter B becomes V and because we do not have V in Arabic it becomes Arabic F et voila it is now called the city of QIFT

# And you, as always, wrong! Here then is a full list of all EgyPtian letters, and clearly there is no 'V':

http://www.eyelid.co.uk/e-name.htm

=====================================================

And this is indeed clear evidence that the letter B in Egyptian is really a V which proves that his little cockamamie theory about hebrew and the letter V is no more than poor reading of the sources external to his tradition and for those that follow his posts he is avoiding his little gem anok pe (Egyptian for I am) which his Allah is supposed to have said it in a Hebrew text go figure

Did you get it our dear iam?

# Your wrong again. The B was adapted as the 'V' later, even after the Arab race emerged, and the reason the Arabic spells AVraham with a 'B'. Your references are bogus, presenting a later, fully impacted Egyptian as original Egyptian.

--------------------------------------

Hint:

1. No Ibrahim wa Musa

# Correction. The original spell is AVRAHAM. Check the dead sea scrolls if still confused.

----------------------------------------

4. The Bible is not a history book

The Hebrew bible is the first history book - with millions of historically idenfiable stats within its words and verses - by period of time, volume of historical facts and by cencus.

-------------------------------------

5. Genesis and Exodus never happened

# How do you know Genesis' creationism never happened, when we have no scientific alternatives to it?

The exodus, namely the transference of a nation of 3 million from Egypt to Canaan - did happen. This is an indisputable historical fact - not an opinion. One can dispute HOW the exodus happened, but not whether the exodus occured. The Israelites lived in Canaan as their sovereign nation till 70 CE and built the greatest monument on earth [The Temple] - twice. Only Muslims chant such dispicable and blatant lies - as they also do in presenting the Protocols as historical truth.

------------------------------------------------------------------

6. The Arabic language goes back as far as 1500BCE

# 400 CE. Ask why we have no Arab dead sea style scrolls - no excuses can be made here!

------------------------------------------------------------

7. The Arabs exist in the literary sources as far back as 900BCE

# If you wish to manipulate a word which sounds like ARAB but not when spelled out. This lie is affirmed by the total absence of anything Arab or Arabic from 900 BCE to 500 BCE. That is very different from the Hebrew, no?!

-----------------------------------------------------------

8. The earliest extant literary epigraphy in Arabic is from Qaryat al-Faw and is dated 100-300BCE

# That is not in Arabic writings! Ple3ase oresent your proof.

-----------------------------------------------------

9. The earliest Arabic inscriptions in defective Arabic are dated to 270CE

# No it does not, even if this date so close to the 400 CE has no impact.

----------------------------------------------------------

10. The Arabic language was fully fledged in the 3rd century (900CE) of Islam at the end of the masoritic activity

# Then you should have no problem presenting some hard copy archives. Which museum?

---------------------------------------------------------

Hello: The second letter in the language of Egypt is B or V oh those pesky Copts!

# See above - a link of original Egyptian does not contain the 'V'.

-------------------------------------------------

1. No Musa wa Ibrahim

>have been well proven.

# No Ibrahim - try Avraham.

How do you expect Arab Muslims to tell us about those figures when they cannot show us any writings anywhere before 400 CE and when the Pre-Islamic Arabs never followed the Abrahamic belief for a period of 2,600 years before islam emerged - and when the Jews did consistabtly follow that belief and have volumes of books 100 years apart? Do you even ponder the logic and coherence of what you are presenting here? Are you aware that Islam never gave humanity a single law the world accepts - while the Hebrew gave humanity every acceptable law enshrined in the world's institutions? The truth is, the Arabs would not know of Abraham but for the Hebrew bible - they adapted to Monotheism by being among Jews in Babylon. Wow - what a co-incidence no!

Instead of making totally false references for Islam, why not first clean the falsehoods parading there as historical truth:

Is the blood libels and Protocols historical truths?

Was the Jewish temple of Jerusalem a Zionist myth?

Are Jews born of the apes?

Are the people who introduced Monotheism and battled mighty Rome to uphold Monotheism also infidels?

Was the Holocaust a myth?

Is it moral to dump Mosques in the sacred sites of other nations around the world - then deny the original nation any rights?

Have Jews ever stolen anyone else's land in all their 4000 year history - which land?

Which is the Jewish homeland?

First cleanse those falsehoods - then try to preach about other nations and beliefs.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".