Our dear Jospeh needs to take a deep breath

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Apr 9, 2010 at 19:18

Our dear Jospeh who needs to take a deep breath and post things that we mortals can undrestand

>The law of precedence applies, else it becomes a lie-by-omission.

You must pardon me Jospeh but this is really gobbledygook

>There were no 'ARABS' nor Arabic writings in the Pharoahic times.

So? And by the way did you ever hear of Herodotus' Arabs? If not then go and read some real history

>The first mention of ancient Egyptian culture and history, is mentioned only in the Torah.

Really? Did you really study the history of Ancient Egypt? Let me guess: you never did and you only learned by pure fahlawa right? If so then go and read a real book of history

>This is also truth of Abraham and his history, as well as any history of ancient Arabia itself. That Allah is great does not also mean a false history view is great.

What is false here our dear Joseph? you see slogans do not work here in this blog so do me a favor and stop your rather silly slogans

>Back to topic, history will show that Jews have never occupied another peoples' land in all their 4000 year history -

So? What is your point?

>making Israel a most legitimate member of Arabia,

More gobbledygook

>one that gave the world its greatest contributions. The Balfour should be restored even if Israel is not demanding this - only to impress that a corrupt history should not be sanctioned as beneficial for humanity, and this is NOT in any country's interest. Nor should a 3-state be passed off as a 2-state - unless when one has a Jewish problem.

Tell me ya habibi what does this have to do with the fact that Egyptian Arabic is a real language or lugha and it is not a lahja?

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".