ANOTHER BLUNDER EXPOSED.

Submitted by IamJoseph (Australia), Jun 2, 2010 at 20:28

# Then prove me wrong but you cannot because you are debating languages that you cannot speak read or write.

I did prove you wrong - numerously. You have now twice disregarded your error in quoting 1st century arabic , as opposed any ancient writings containing the 'V'. I told you, not even the ancient Phoenecian contained this alphabet.:

Quote: Coptic and Demotic are grammatically closely akin to Late Egyptian, which was written in the hieroglyphic script. It was supplanted by Egyptian Arabic as a spoken language toward the early modern period, though revitalization efforts have been underway since the nineteenth century.Unquote.

This has nothing to do with you speaking aravic. It is english comprehension and honesty which matters. On both issues of Arabic writing being recent - around 400 CE, and that the Arab race is not older than 500 BCE - have been well proven.

The matter of the 'V' alphabet is also proven with no impact from your eronous references: you cannot submit 1st century writings to show that ancient Egyptian possessed the 'V'. Here is my previous response again:

Your submissions are totally baseless - quoting new languages as a manipulation. Check the dates herein. The original, ancient languages, even Phoenecian - did not contain the 'V'. The new languages acquired these recently.

Coptic or Coptic Egyptian^[7] (Met Remenkēmi) is the final stage of the Egyptian language, a northern Afro-Asiatic language spoken in Egypt until at least the seventh century. Egyptian began to be written using the Greek alphabet in the first century. The new writing system became the Coptic script, an adapted Greek alphabet with the addition of six to seven signs from the demotic script to represent Egyptian sounds the Greek language did not have. Several distinct Coptic dialects are identified, the most prominent of which are Sahidic and Bohairic.

Coptic and Demotic are grammatically closely akin to Late Egyptian, which was written in the hieroglyphic script. The main difference is in the writing. Coptic flourished as a literary language from the second to thirteenth centuries, and its Bohairic dialect continues to be the liturgical language of the Coptic Orthodox Church of Alexandria. It was supplanted by Egyptian Arabic as a spoken language toward the early modern period, though revitalization efforts have been underway since the nineteenth century.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".