ARAB-ISLAMIC MYTHS

Submitted by IamJoseph (Australia), May 19, 2010 at 20:20

Hello: If you tell a Copt that hs is not an Arab then he will agree with you but if you tell him that he is Arabian he will laugh laugh at you and will tell you that an Arabian as an adjective means Arab and as a noun it means an Arab and he ain't an Arab and that your command of the English is poor

# The term Arabian predates the term ARAB. If a Copt does not like the term Arabian, it means only the connection to ARAB is not accepted - which is in a sense correct because the term ARAB has been falsely associated with all things Arabian. Arabian refers to a region, while Arab refers to an ethnic group. The term ARAB JEWS for Jews living in countries of an Arab majority is also faulty, while the term ARABIAN JEW would be more correct. Jews predate the ARAB race - so do the Copts. The take-over of Arabia by Arabs, which was a term initiated by the Greeks - has ruined the middle-east and history per se, and the faculties allocated to the Arab Muslims - like zero, algebra, etc - are false: the world's first scientific censor, conducted in the millions, with gender and age sub-totals - are recorded in the Hebrew bible - long before the Arabs existed. There has been no contribution by Arabs outside of the period when Jews and other races were not assisting them with writings, admn, medicine and wealth management. See what the Arabs did when the Jews left in the 40's - zero, despite having all the land and wealth for naught!

----------------------------------------------------------

> many who predate the Arabs, such as the Jews, the Copts, the Kurds, the Assyrians, the Lebanese, the Egyptians, the Canaanites, the Moabites, the Midianites, etc - all of these are varied and predating of the ARAB race.

So?

It means Arabs are not as ancient as those races.

-----------------------------------

And stop this ugle "Arab race"

Its better than the term INFIDEL and Muslim Palestineans. My history lessons says the term infidel cannot apply to Jews - who were Monotheists 2,600 years before Muslims emerged. My history lesson says the term Palestineans is an insult to whoever wears it - it is not of an Arabian people and was dumped as a sign of disdain on the Jewish homeland of Judea - not any Islamic or Arab one. The Arabs were in the front rows of Rome's army as paid mercenaries destroying the Jerusalem temple - the same people who today chant that same temple was a Zionist myth. So history has been flaunted here in the most blatant manner possible - this says much about so-called Islamic beliefs - they are totally based on falsehoods.

--------------------------------

>This is the reason you cannot produce a single reference to ARAB pre-500 BCE;

And I will leave this remark to the readers to judge you

# Why - when your own references prove the term ARAB does not appear in those writings - are you saying that ARVI and AVDOT mean ARAB? Why do you say the word ARAB does not appear pre-500 BCE at any time, not even once - did the Arabic writing change, and if so, when did the Arabic writings include the correct term Arab, and f ARVI applies, when did the 'V' alphabet become incorporated into the Arabic?

-----------------------------------------------

>it never existed. What you have been doing here is - manipulating words like Arvi, which appears once or twice in Hebrew writings -

Oh you mean the Hebrew Bible? then write those that translate it into English and tell them that their translations are not correct but you know what? you are the last one to pontificate about the English language

# The original says the term ARAB does not appear. Further, we have no historical imprints of that word pre-500 BCE. The dead sea scrolls are more legitimate than what is later transated in error.

---------------------------------------------------

>and fixing this as your proof of ARAB. A word containing the 'V' cannot apply to Arabs - they never possessed this alphabet. Nor will we find any imprints between Arvi and Arab.

So go and tell them that and they will laugh at you

# They cannot laugh - nor can they prove themselves right, which clearly applies to your own position also.

--------------------------------------------------

>Guess why can't you show us the word ARAB pre-500 BCE - or any Arabic writings re-400 CE?

shame on you for uttering this nonsense

You need to get your money back from your madrassa

# The UN has been made into a Madarassa. If there is such a thing as a Muslim freedom fighter, let it be seen where it most counts - freedom fighters start at home. Why are Muslims not responding to the horrific fasehoods in their own countries, where the Protocols of Zion and the Blood Libels are presented as true history and Jerusalem is an Islamic city? I have yet to hear Muslims tell us what are the rights of Zionists - if any - and which is the Jewish homeland! Am I asking taboo questions of the Arab Muslims? My history lessons say Jerusalem is not the third holy place of Islam but the first holy place of the Jews - and this truth does not change no matter how many Mosques are dumped in Jerusalem. Where one touts their beliefs as the excuse for robbery and falsehoods, then this must apply:

" A FALSEHOOD AND THE HOLY ONE CANNOT ABIDE TOGETHER"

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".