ALL YOUR SUBMISSIONS ARE USELESS.

Submitted by IamJoseh (Australia), May 11, 2010 at 03:16

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), May 9, 2010 at 06:50

This is what I wrote

Coptic is a script and Egyptian is the langauge

And this is where the fun starts

># Are you saying an ancient Coptic script had no language!?

Hello: The languages of Egypt in the late antique before the Arab invasion in 642CE were

1. Egyptian

# Great kid stuff.

2. Greek was the language of the ruling class, the Greeks in Alexandria and the Greek settlers in the Cora

# Greasy kid stuff.

The alphabets used were

1. In the case of Egyptian are Hieroglyphs, Hieratic, Demotic and then from the 3rd century CE on it became what is known now as Coptic (where 20% of the language was loan words from Greek)

# Greasy kid stuff.

2. In the case of Greek it was the Greek alphabet

# The Greeks got their alphabeticals from the Hebrew - there are Greek alphabetical books okder than the Hebrew.

Now do you get it?

# Its you who still does not get it. The above stats are commonly known and not in dispute. You are saying that ancient Egyptian arabic, which you call EA, is proof of Arabs pre-500 BCE, and/or Arab writings pre-400 CE. I say, there is no Arabs before 500 BCE and no Arabic writings before 400 CE. The EA and Diaglosia has no impact here. I am not disputing that Arabs invaded Egypt in the 7th century - I say this is proof the Arabs are not Egyptian, never spoke ancient Egypt, and have no imprints before 500 BCE. You have not been able to counter these facts despite an array of false names submitted, as applying to Arabs, nor does EA change anything. Now do you get it?

What you need to show, is a thread of dots between Abraham and an Arab figurehead, with Arab names, kings, cities, nations, wars, relics, monuments, books, etc. This is not a big ask: it is seen in all nations - the Herews, the Greeks, the Indians and most any race which survives to day. This is nit the case with the Arabs, and usurping names which may sound similar, in the absence of a thread of imprints - is 100% bogus. If you tout an Arab king 3000 years ago, or 900 BCE, then show us a relic or coin with that king;s name - as with King david and King Solomon. No excuses are of merit here.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".