This time our dear iam does not seem to realize that history is never black and white

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), May 2, 2010 at 12:41

And more from our dear iam

>But ANO is different and represents ancient Egyptian,

Hello: The word I in Egyptian is Anok or Ang and not your bogus Ano! Get over it and do me a favor and get your money back from your madrassa

>It is also ANO.

No it is not. It is anok or ang

>This is the prefix for ANOK.

Really? Prefix? Do you really know what is a prefix? Or in this case a prefix in Egyptian? let me guess you have no clue right? why the delusions?

>And CHI is AM.

OK here is the book about the Egyptian language grammar and this case the Sahidic dialect (the dialect of the pharaohs) and it is 'Layton 2000" so where would I find in Layton that Ano means I and chi means am? you will not find it and shame on you

And oh ano chi must be arabic ana hay!

>The Hebrew bible marks the first reference to ancient Egypt, detailing a host of stats not seen before, from location, kings, diets, wars, towns, distances from other places and correct datings.

Really? and it also tells us about the story of the Exodus that never happened right? so much for the history of Egypt

Shame on you for uttering this nonsense

But again you sound like Muslims when they tell us the Qur'an is a book of history and science and medicine and it is no more than Arabian ignorance

>The Arabic giave us NOTHING about Egypt. This is a fact, not my opinion.

Hello: the Arabs were no more than imperialists!

>You do not even admit this.

Admit what? that the Arabs were imperialists? they were and it is a fact

>its first recorded example being the Hebrew bible.

Hello: why would your Hebrew Allah use an Egyptian word in a Hebrew text? Any guesses? Surpise me with one

># What are you talking about - gibberish? There is no Hebrew allah -

You did not get it did you? You sound like like Muslims and your arguments could have been written by a Muslim where you would substitute the word Arab for jew and the word Qur'an for Bible

> that is a newIslamic term from the 6th C.

No it is not. It is loan word from Syriac Alaha

>The Hebrew does not use that term for describing Egypt.

Gobbeldygook

But here is your bonus for today: when I told you that some of the Quranic material pre-dates Muhammad you did not get it that this really means that we can detach Muhammad from the Qur'an and we can detach Islam from the Hijaz but again you are a careless reader

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".