ANOTHER FCTICIOUS NAME.

Submitted by IamJoseh (Australia), May 11, 2010 at 03:42

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), May 9, 2010 at 07:17

Our dear iam wrote

>Then you reasoned the Quran has pre-dating knowledge of events which have yet to materialise

Mr careless reader where did I say that?the Qur'an is a book that was written by human beings and it has a history behind it too and it does not predict anything and it is no more than a book of ignorance just like all holy books

# You in fact did mention the Quran has predating writings as yet not materialised.

---------------------------------------------

But now back to Versteegh page 23

"reliefs in the palace of king Assurbanipal in Niniveh show camel riders being fought and subdued by the Assyrians"

So did king Assurbanipal made this up?

# No - you made it up that it is connected to ARAB. It is not:

Sargon II ( Akkadian Šarru-kên "legitimate king", reigned 722 – 705 BC) was an Assyrian king. Sargon II became co-regent with Shalmaneser V in 722 BC, and became the sole ruler of the kingdom of Assyria in 722 BC after the death of Shalmaneser V. It is not clear whether he was the son of Tiglath-Pileser III or a usurper unrelated to the royal family. In his inscriptions, he styles himself as a new man, rarely referring to his predecessors; however he took the name Sharru-kinu ("true king"), after Sargon of Akkad — who had founded the first Semitic Empire in the region some 16 centuries earlier.^[1] Sargon is the Biblical form of the name.

----------------------

Stay tuned for more

# Yes, do some more checking. So far, all your submissions have been responded to. They were all negative of the Arab word. Perhaps it will dawn on you why the pre-Islamic Arabs were not observing the Arahamic and Mosaic beliefs and have no archives from this period -displaying the reverse of the Jews - because they were not around at the time - you think?.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".