Our dear Ridwan and his bogus Arabic part trois

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Aug 18, 2007 at 06:45

You wrote

>the memorizers of (the) Quran (read as Qur'an) were hamil (the ones who carried)

One word bogus. The word hamil (root HML) means he who carries and it does not mean the ones who carried as you claim. Now let me correct your bogus Arabic it should be

al-ladhina hamalu or al-hamiluun

Or Those who carried or the carriers

Now I will give you a second chance: could you provide me with reference and I will make it easy for you from Qamoos Lisan al-3Arab that would support your rather bizarre assertion? And do me a favor please use definite artilce and the Qur'an is al-Qur'an and not your Quran or I will strat writing Koran so what do you want?

>Hafiz was originally used for scholars who have memorized 100,000 hadith (sic)

Bogus you realized that you have been exposed and now you are trying to find a way out. Typical tablighee tactic.

No it is called ahadith as this is plural and no there is no definite article here. Coudl you provide me with reference that will support such funny assertion? wikipedia, Paki/Muslim web sites and "I Ridwan said so" or "Zakir Naik said so" will not be regarded as evidence.

The following will be accepted as evidence:

1. Texts from the Muslim masora.

2. Qawamees wa ma3ajim

And where is your evidence that we have 100,000 ahadith?

As for the word hafiz it is used by Pakistanis for he who memorizes the Qur'an and for this see Hans Wehr dicitionary page 188B and 189A and B and it has nothing to do with those that memorized the hadith if they actually ever existed.

How come you did not know that? ...And I'm still waiting for you to tell me where I can find the word Ridwan in the Qur'an.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".