Why do you quote a corrupted book to prove a point? revisited

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Feb 21, 2014 at 08:40

Roman Christian point of view is Jesus = Holy spirit = Father (but with non connected individual awareness?).

I have two questions for yo

1. Muhammad aka Allah says that the Trinity is really Mary Allah and Jesus so is that true?

2. What is the difference between أسماء الله الحسنى and اقانيم الله? Let me help you there is no difference after all how can your Allah be a مكار and at the same time صادق unless we have 99 Allah so do we have 99 Allahs our dear Nasr the wannabe Arab who needs to get a real job?

3. How come Allah was not able to stop the Jews and the Christians from corrupting their books unless Allah is not omnipotent or there is no Allah so which one is it our dear Nasr?

4. Why do you quote a corrupted book to prove a point you tell me

Hint: Never quote the Bible to prove a point now do you get it?

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".