Abul Qasim's name if the Bible! Masha'allah! read and laugh

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Aug 18, 2013 at 08:19

Our dear Submitter who lives in Malaysia which would become a basket case if the Chinese and the Hindus and non Muslims left and he is busy not working as the Chinese do but fooling himself by pretending to know not one but several languages when he cannot even read Arabic

The question that most of us ask now, arose before during the time of Muhammad s.a.w; preaching the words of God onto Arabia. Was Muhammad mentioned?

Who gave you the impression that we kuffar care if your so called prophet is or is not mentioned in the Bible?

This was the question by inhabitants of Arabia towards Jews that embraced Islam. And if we refer to the claim by past Jewish converts, they had quote verses from Isaiah 42.In passages of Isaiah. God address His chosen servants with their names, and in the prophesied verse we see God mention clearly the prophet's name. **Some examples of God mentioning His servant by name.(My Servant Isaiah, My Servant Eliakim, David My Servant, Jacob My Servant, My Servant Israel, and so in Isaiah 42:1 , God specifically mention My Servant Ahmad

So let me see: You are quoting the Bible right? So are you saying that the Bible is not a corrupted book right? So a yes or no answer will do and if the answer is yes it is a corrupted book then this is the end of your discussion because you cannot reach conclusions based on information from a corrupted book! Do you get this much or are you another poorly educated Muslim? you tell me and if your answer is no it is not a corrupted book then I will inform the nut cases in Wahhabi land that you our dear Submitter is saying that the Bible is not a corrupted book so which one option one of option two?

But wait your Allah teslls us:

1. He is the author of the NT and OT right?

2. He also tells us that no one can change his word

3. He also tells us that we kuffar can find Muhammad's name in the books of them Joos and Nasarra Q7:157

Do you know what this means? It means that your Allah is saying that the Bible cannot be corrupted so is the Bible corrupted or not?

Why cannot Allah make up his mind you tell me

But I will give you a chance:

1. I'm sure you agree with me that your masters the Arabs tell us that your so called Rasul's name we Qutham or قثم so where can we find it the Bible? Let me help you you will not find it

2. I'm sure you are aware that your Arab masters tell us that his kunya was Abul Qasim ابو القاسم so where would we find it in the Bible? you will not find it

3. You will find the name Muhammad محمد four times in the Qur'an and it can be read as an attribute than a name so you tell us where does it say in the corrupted Bible that this Muhamad is Abul Qasim whose name is Qutham and who was born in 3Am al-Feel or 570CE and received his mab3ath in 610CE or may be 613CE and only Allahu A3lam and who immgrated from Mecca to Medina in 622CE and who died in 632CE let me help you you will not find it

4. We are also told that one of his names was Taha so where would i find it in the corrupted Bible you tell us

5. We are also told that Elyaseen is one of his names so where would we find this name in the Bible?

6. And one of his names is Ahmad right and you tell us that this is the one in Isiah right? But wait I DMN my real name is Muhammad and my friends call me Ahmad do you think that I'm the Ahamd mentioned in Isiah? what do you think? Do you see why your claims are really bogus?

7. Now here is the real disaster محمد عبد الله ورسوله and you will find it in Q33:56 or Muhammad is the servant of Allah and his messenger right? But here is the problem the word Muhammad here is an attribute and not a real name as you shall see and the disaster here is the Arabs tell us that the word means the praised one but the praised one in Arabic really means محمود or Mahmoud so congratulations our dear submitter your so called prophet's name is not really Muhammad but Mahmoud what a disaster

So who is this Muhammad Abd Allah? we have to turn to Q19:30 where it says قال اني عبد الله or Jesus is saying that he is Abd Allah and indeed in Syro-Arabic christianity Jesus was the praised one who is MUhammad (which is a Syriac word fro the praised one) and he is THE Abd Allah

What a disaster there ain't no Muhammad the PUBH and it is all about Jesus

7. Oh Ibn Ishaq's Munahemmna? It is Jesus Christ and would you like to know more?

Oh there is more so Ibn Ishaq tells us that Muhammad is really منحّمنا في اللغة السوريانية he is saying that the word Muhammad in Syriac is Munahhmana! and this is one evidence that you can find the name of Muhammad in the Syriac Bible

But wait Ibn Ishaq did not even get it as the word nahem in Syriac ܢܚܡ means to raise from the dead and as far as we know Muhammad did not "rise from the dead" and it was Jesus therefore:

Congratulations our dear submitter the lost tablighee but Ibn Ishaq's Munahhemana is really Christ who must be the Muhammada(n) or the blessed

Sorry it is your sources that are telling us that

Oh there is more Ibn Ishaq also tells us that البرقليتس , oh let me help you with this one, or the Paraclete is Muhammad in Greek

But now we have established that Jesus is really the one who "raise from the dead" therefore he is really the Muhammda(n) therefore Jesus must be the paraclete as per ibn ishaq

And you know what? this is what the Syrians tell us as in St. Ephrem who told us that Jesus is the Paraclete

Then congratulations our dear submitter but ibn Ishaq is really saying that Jesus is the Munahhemana as well as the Paralete and therofore he must be the Muhammad(n) or the blessed one

It is your islamic sources that tell us all of this and if you do not like it then destory them and good riddance

So you tell me based on your flawed logic you think that the Ahamd in the corrupted Bible is me? And why not?

In Isaiah 42:1, it is deemed not a coincidence upon seeing the writing of both אתמך (Atmc) אחמד (Ahmd). And the word before אתמך (Atmc), is עבדי (Abdi~My Servant). For indeed, it is indicating Ahmad; Abdullah (Ahmad; Servant of God).
**Not to mention אתמך (Atmc) happen to be a special term foretelling the coming of a righteous man and is used only ONCE throughout the entire Book. [could this be a copying error or an intended error?]

You have a big disaster ahead of you before you can draw your cockamamie conclusions as you can see before I finish and shame on you for not using your barin cells but stay tuned for this one as I'm not done with you

~~
The prophecy tells about Ahmad; 'Servant of God' whom will war to correct the wrongs and bringing judgement based on the law of God.

But we have established that Jesus is really the Servant of Allah as per Q19:30 right?

He will liberate act of worshiping molten images and thus Arabia (wilderness desert, villages and cities) will glorify God since then. **As can be seen today, Arabia are worshiping,praising God and singing words of God daily. Inhabitants from all around the world gather there and voice out loud their praise to God.

Gobbledygook

And we continue reading Isaiah 42:18 – 25; God remind the 'blind and deaf' about the wrath of God towards Children of Israel, whom neglect the message brought by past Servant of God.

Oh I see you are quoting a corrupted book to prove a point. Not very smart

And not to repeat; the same mistake upon the coming of the new Servant of God

You are ignorant

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".