Submitted by Prashant (United States), Aug 3, 2019 at 17:41
Dear Dr Pipes, you astute reader Joy.J very correctly pointed out that if the then estimates of the then world population are correct, the Muslims invaders could not have killed 600MM hindus in those days. Logic trumps all rhetorical arguments.
But there is some truth to the rhetorical arguments nevertheless. The original author probably means that if the original massacre by Muslim invaders had not been done, Hindu population in the invaded regions would have been of the order of 600MM. That is 100% correct: just look at 98% Muslim population
Of Pakistan and 90% Muslim population of Bangladesh. And, Hindus were not the only cowards. Persians, Christians, Jews, Yadizis have all been victims of Islamic barbarians.
I once wrote on you site that Muslims need to go back to their homes and come back as monks who respect the right to freewill that God granted to all humans. It is undoable but I stand by it.
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".