Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Dec 26, 2021 at 08:50
Our dear Abdul (sic) is not happy that the Qur'an is really saying that Muhammad could not have been the messenger sent to his Hindu ancestors.
>(Not every Arab is Muslim
Your Allah says in Q14:4 that he sends a messenger only if he speaks the language of his people. So Allah sent Abul Qasim aka Muhammad to his people the Hijazi Arabs because he spoke their language Arabic that is. And Allah sent 124,000 prophet to various nations and each one was sent because he spoke the language of his nation. Do you get it or are you that slow?
Muhammad did not speak any of the languages of India right? Then who was the messenger that was sent to your Hindu ancestors because he is not Muhammad?
Leave Islam and the cultural imperialism of the Arabs who hijacked your real culture and identity and now you post under some mangled Arabic name.
BTW "Abdul" is mangling the Arabic 'Abd al-
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".