Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Dec 21, 2021 at 16:03
Our dear Abdul (sic) poor education shines this is what he wrote:
> if you want to actually read a true biography, read "MUHAMMED" by Martin Lings.
Mr. ignorant if you want to know about "what really happened" as it pertains to the life of Abul Qasim aka Quthm your so called prophet, I would read the earliest extant books about his life IN ARABIC. Translations are not accepted. This leaves us with al-Maghazi and Ibn Hisham's redaction of Ibn Ishaq al-Sira al-Nabawiyya as well as al-Tabari's Tarikh. You learn this if you study the "Historical Method" but again you are not just clueless you are ignorant.
More damaging to your claim is that what we have in the early Islamic sources in Arabic a language that you cannot read speak or write is "Salvation History" or PIOUS FICTION non of it is true. We do not know (gasp!) very much about the life of your so called prophet. It is all fiction and pure nonsense that no serious historian should believe that it really happened
Next? So do tell us why K. S. Lal reconstruction of the atrocities inflicted on your Hindu ancestors is not true.
Hint: Scholar XYZ says Lal is incorrect because.... Do you get it our dear Abdul (sic) صلى الله عليه وسلم ?
Now, here is a link to another scholar of the history of India and that is Konrad Elst and the book is in pdf file and by the way: copy-past the link and open a new page paste et voila! Illiterate like your prophet
https://www.academia.edu/16578319/Was_There_an_Islamic_Genocide_of_Hindus
And here is another work by Elst about the sad "Negationism In India" and why the deluded left among Hindus as well as victims of Islam, like you, deny the atrocities inflicted on Hindus by the Muslim invaders of India
https://www.amazon.com/Negationism-India-Concealing-Record-Islam/dp/8185990956/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_product_top?ie=UTF8
Hint: Muslims invaded India so they can loot and brutalize your ancestors
I feel sorry for you
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".